Israel, too, don't forget.
https://twitter.com/LassMacarthur/st...56096839991300
Depends on why/how the data is bad, and the type of error you are talking about. If the problem is false positives, then if the error rate is assumed to stay the same you can interpret increases or decreases as changes in prevalence, even if you don't know what the actual numbers are. If you are using the same tests, you can probably assume the accuracy rate will not change much. "Bad data" does not necessarily mean we know nothing.
Right. Especially if you already know what you want the trend to be.
The media do this to us. Here's a wonderful example from today's news about the SCOTUS nomination: No, Amy Coney Barrett Doesn't Belong to a Catholic Group That Inspired 'The Handmaid's Tale'
Andrews is pure evil
Andrews is ?off the leash? amid ?preposterous? proposed Omnibus bill - YouTube
Omnibus laws to 'create a certain class of citizens empowered with extra rights' - YouTube
This is how people should speak to politicians
New South Wales Labor MP warns against Daniel Andrews? emergency measure - YouTube