I am also able to look of definitions of words on the internet. However, I am not able to diagnose anyone with any psychological condition without these two key things:
1- Expertise in clinical psychological diagnosis
2- Diagnosing someone through what I see on a TV and going through a checklist of what I think I see against definitions found on the internet. I just have a feeling it should be done in person through appropriate clinical means, by a clinician with a very specific skill-set and domain knowledge.
So to review: You know fuck all about Trump's persona or the kind of media Rip consumes.
We get it. Folks like you have an instinctive icky feeling that disables your ability to actually investigate anything icky...because it's icky.
And who can argue with someone, like yourself, who has done such extensive research into the subject?
On the contrary, I really enjoy conversing with him over the internet.Rip gets it, wiigelec. You really, really don't like him. He gets that. Really, he does.
He’s one of the few electronic people I can chat with, in the same manner I chat with the people I work with (I’m oilfield trash), who won’t get offended and delete my account.
I don't think they are trying to hide their number allocations better because they can't. The democrats didn't think they'd have to go to this degree of voter fraud. They weren't expect this big of a turn out of Trump supporters. They thought they would be able to hide the fraud easier in the "blue wave," but that didn't happen. When it became apparent election night that Trump was winning, and was going to win, the states stopped counting. I think the democrats were in full blown panic mode behind closed doors. In order to win they have to expose themselves in this fraud, but they don't care. Getting rid of Trump is everything. They'll deal with the voter fraud later.
You do realize that all of the things you hold against trump are displayed by practically every politician, right?
Personally, I’ve never liked trump, but I’m not buying any of this shit that the dems are pushing.
The guy says silly shit on occasion and is manipulative like every politician, but the reality of it is that he is more genuine than all of these virtue signaling, fake-ass liberals. This obviously doesn’t sit well with a lot of people because in this day and age people like yourself would rather be lied to by a DNC puppet than deal with a president who doesn’t sound like PC principal.
Would the EU-US-AUS-CA-NZ financial cold war be a civil war? The policies appear to be negotiated and highly coordinated as far as I can tell.
In the U.S., the Federal Reserve is the unelected 4th branch of government (Presidential, Legislative, Judicial, Financial). I assume the Financial branch of government in the EU is also unelected.
Only if we sit back and allow her to steal the election.
I know this is a topic that is verboten and even the most libertarian, pro speech individuals do not feel comfortable recognizing it; But, a map of only 3rd generation American voters or a map of only white Americans would have Trump winning every state, except Washington State. 49/50. Most by huge margins.
Who are the Californians? They are not the same people or the same DNA as they were 50 years ago. As they say, France is no longer France. Paris is no longer French.
There is a lot of talk about Trump's gains among hispanic voters, but Biden still won the Hispanic vote by very large margins, and even in Flordia.
Florida is a state where most of the hispanics have first or second hand experience with the horrors of communism/socialism. Yet, they still voted for it. This election looks much more like a Venezuelan election than the U.S. election of 1876.
The one positive coming out of this situation is that more people will realize democracy doesn't work.
Our elections have been a sham for a long time and the unelected "permanent government" does not work for the interests of the American People or the British People or the French or the Germans etc.