I find it a strong argument I heard from a leftie American. It's important to consider counterarguments. So I'll ask it again: If the dems commited fraud to win the presidency, why would they not do the same for the senate? I'm interested in what the response is of someone who believes these fraud allegations. I don't know what to believe, and I don't need to. You don't have to feel insulted if you don't have a rebuttal. English is not my first language, I wasn't trying to be facetious. My apologies if I came across as such.
Heck no, according to CNN, I'm a neonazi. Thank God they have no presence over here.
Why is there a need to deny:
(1) Trump said some racist shit once
(2) he dislikes muslims
A person can admit both and still support the resulting policies.
Most Hungarians, including me, are proud of our immigration policies.
I would still vote "far right" (according to CNN type outlets) even if our leader bashed some Pakistanis or something. Because the alternative would be Budapest turning into Paris and teachers being beheaded.
But I can and would still oppose a policy of separating families to dissuade immigration. A wall is more effective.
Why can't this one aspect be criticized as less humane than his predecessors?
The goal of OUR immigration policy should be to preserve our catholic national identity, not to make others suffer.
We already lost 2/3 of our country in 1920 due to immigration. Our border fence has been a success for the most part,
except that it should've been placed a little to the south.