Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: The ‘Life-Saving’ Drug that Seems to be Killing People. As usual, Colpo pulls no punches:
https://anthonycolpo.com/pfizer-bion...illing-people/
Good grief Mark. Your Nancy has more power then Harris and Biden combined. She wants to rule over you. Is she not 3rd in line for the Presidency if the other two became incapacitated?
"As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. My people, your leaders are misleading you— they're giving you confusing directions." Isaiah3v12
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: The ‘Life-Saving’ Drug that Seems to be Killing People. As usual, Colpo pulls no punches:
https://anthonycolpo.com/pfizer-bion...illing-people/
Actually a reasonable article. When it comes to diseases that are not catastrophic, i.e. not like ebola, this is what could happen. Some people are immune from the beginning, some are more or less unaffected, some get sick, and some are hit really hard. After this has has run its course for a while, and the bulk of the population is protected by vaccination, it could become like so many other diseases that are potentially harmful, but possible to live with.
I have no idea how people are excited about new parties or the rumors of Trump starting a media company or anything like it.
There are only two possibilities than matter:
1- We just experienced YUGE and blatant election fraud, so votes don't matter and therefore anything they do is pointless because it leads to the ballot box. Because you know, actual revolutions against tyrants are sooo passe.
2- We just experienced the biggest gaslighting campaign claiming YUGE and blatant election fraud and everyone involved is a complete piece of shit simply looking for a new way to get paid pretending to be the good guys.
Prosecutions or secession or both are the only things that should secure any long term trust in anyone that was involved if allegedly trying to prove fraud.
In Sidney's case: she should be riding out the Dominion slander case as a means to expose them as guilty of her claims. I get that maybe she thinks the courts are too corrupt to win, but she should stop collecting contributions for shit she can't do.
Been busy...catching up...
Q posted on 12/23/2019:
"Q" never encouraged pacifism; just the opposite. Q did, however, insist people remain non-violent. Amazing Polly's video (posted earlier...start at 1:50 for this point) addresses the fantasies of little boys who want to run around their yard and play army. Wrong kind of war...wrong decade...exactly what the enemy wants/needs silly boys to do.Why do [D]s want to flood the US w/ illegal immigrants?
This is not another [4] year election.
Our democracy is at stake.
POWER & CONTROL.
Do not mistake this backchannel [tool] as a means to be complacent.
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Your voice and your vote matters.
Q
I agree...on everything you wrote except federal student loan nullification. My wife and I paid off our student loans; it really sucked. It taught us both an important lesson: do not forget, stay out of debt. Others need to learn that lesson too....personal responsibility.
But, if you want to refund my family's student loans plus interest, then I'm good with your student loan nullification plan.
As Q explained it
Permit me to show an example why "QAnon" is the label [they] want you to use:There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
Where'd you get that? There are no (zero) Q posts suggesting Hollywood is owned by the Chinese.
Most of the comments I see here attribute QAnon (qtard) theories to Q. In fact, I think you guys probably attribute my theories to Q. Nope: they are my own stupid ass theories (military tribunals due to constitutional crisis, for example) that never panned out. Q never even used the word "Tribunal".
Most of what people read about Q has NOTHING to do with the actual Q posts....just like the misinformation we see in MSM about the "virus" or the capital "riot" of violent right-wing extremists. The information war is real....and Q certainly was part of it.
I read somewhere years ago that the Final War will be between The People and The Banks. I suspect this is it. Trump attempted to be the reincarnation of Andrew Jackson; he killed the central Bank. They were ready for Trump, to say the least. The Bankers' grip on our balls is truly impressive.
That poor QTard that grabbed your attention doesn't even know what a central banking system is...or why that might be a problem for us. Q did.
Rip, thanks for allowing the Q ideas to be posted here. I won't mention it again: It's Dead, Jim.
I'll wait a couple months before settling up our Brennan bet; for some bizarre reason, the declass started a few days before Trump left office.
BMueller, you were right. I'm a dumbass. Superman (our military) isn't coming to save us. We're gonna have to do this the hard way. The country either gets under the bar now, or it shrivels up into an old man who can't get off the toilet.
To confuse matters...last night, Scavino briefly posted (and then deleted) the following image on his Instagram: Trump reveal
I found this entertaining:
Lin Wood secretly joins zoom call and records it.
Lin Wood says:I learned today that my alma mater Mercer Law School was holding a Zoom conference call with faculty and students to discuss demands that my name be removed from a courtroom in the school. The school named the courtroom for me after I made a $1M donation to the school. I did not seek the recognition. I joined the call unbeknownst to the Dean, Cathy Cox. After she falsely slandered me, including references to my relationship with my children, I spoke up. I spoke truth. Judge for yourself after listening to my remarks.
Probably because one state does not have the constitutional ground, “standing” as it were, to effect the elector selection process identified by another state’s legislature, nor contest it in the event of perceived misconduct.Why would the SCOTUS want to involve itself in a contested election where 40% of the states think there was a problem?
If the state legislatures of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Wisconsin have issues with the way their electors were selected, why haven’t they filed suit against their respective executive branch in their respective state court? That would be the only constitutionally appropriate course of action in this case.
Unless you disagree with the sovereignty of the individual states? You wouldn’t want New York or California to have a say in how Texas selects its electors, would you?
*still blue in the face*Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
...and you still haven’t answered the questions...