I guess what I’m trying to say is that are three kinds of people in this hypothetical. Those that think that it’s a miracle of modern medicine to develop something in such a short timeframe that can alter people’s DNA to better fight an infection, who are happy to get the vaccine. Then there are those who think that there was an extreme market incentive for any pharmaceutical company to develop something they can call a vaccine as quickly as possible (the companies that have a product out the earliest capture the biggest share of the market) and are not legally liable for the consequences of producing an unsafe (or generally unhealthy, either short or long term) product, and those people do not get the vaccine. Then there is a third type of person who agrees with the second person, but gets the vaccine anyway. Those are the people I was referring to in my previous post.