This is absolutely stunning. The CDC is doing vaccine follow up PCR testing with a ct count of <28.
As I said many pages ago, this is how it all ends (after Biden’s spending is done.)
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-1...estigation.pdf
You’re welcome. Lots of great info on his Telegram account. Here’s the latest:
Not only are the COVID 'vaccines' ineffective, they appear to cause the very thing they are supposed to prevent. A consistent pattern of spiking case and death numbers in countries rolling out the vaccines is emerging...Mongolia is an illustrative example. COVID was pretty much a non-issue in the country throughout 2020. On February 23 they rolled out the new poison and, sure enough, cases and deaths started rising markedly a short while later.
Mongolia: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps
What do you mean by "prepper-types"? If I keep 50 rolls of toilet paper and some ammo in stock, do I qualify?
No, you have to face the reality that you are a fucking moron for conflating what is not a vaccine and doesn't save anyone from shit with actual vaccines that actually do save lives. On top of that you are a dick for trying to portray myself and others as anti-vaccine because we are not making that same stupid mistake.
How so?
Preppers buy a bunch of potentially unnecessary shit and generally mind their business while the Covid freaks demand that the whole world shut down to avoid a sniffle.
Both may be weirdos, but the difference would be more than degree.
Almost every rural family I know buys in bulk these days. Hell, a good chunk of suburbanites do their shopping at places like Sam's Club.
I doubt any of them contributed to TP shortages because of last spring's shutdowns or every hurricane or major snowstorms.
It's going to take longer that 2 weeks, so I'm okay.
______________________________________________
This article Transgender women in sport: Are they really a 'threat' to female sport? - BBC Sport continues to fascinate me with its amazing audaciousness.
Not a single aspect of this is true at any level, but since it appears on the state-run media of the UK, you are expected to just nod in mindless agreement. This is how they work. They set the premise, which is unquestioned, and anyone benighted enough to disagree is dismissed as a dangerous fool. Really, read the whole thing -- it's a study in propaganda, although the editor illustrating the text may have been attempting to insert some logical perspective with his picture of "Hannah" about the tackle the female.McKinnon argues there is "no such thing as a level playing field" anyway.
"People can say that cis gender [people whose gender matches that of their birth sex] men are 8-12% stronger than cis gender women, and I'm willing to accept that figure for the sake of argument.
"But we have to recognise that the average difference between men and women is far smaller than between the weakest and strongest woman, or the shortest and tallest woman.
"We permit very tall women to compete against short women in sports that select for tallness like basketball, volleyball or rowing, and we consider that fair. So we permit very large competitive advantages through natural characteristics.
"It also depends on the sport. For sports like cycling, where if you're going uphill you want to be as light as possible but as powerful as possible, someone with a larger skeleton is going to be carrying more weight, which is not helping them."