Some Clarification: There is only one type of spike protein on SARS CoV2, it has 2 sub-units S1 and S2. The news release from Salk misstates that "the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines)". The Pfizer, Moderna, J&J encode for the entire spike protein (see: An overview of spike protein antigen COVID-19 vaccine candidates). The spike protein used in the study from Circulation is the spike protein present on SARS CoV2 - it was expressed using an noninfectious pseudo-virus though and not SARS CoV2. That is a limitation but it does suggest that vaccination with the 3 aforementioned vaccines is a concern for vascular endothelial harm.
Alright, child, I'm going to explain this thread one more fucking time to you. I post lots of things here because the state-run media will not. Some of what I post may be over your head, and some of it may even be wrong. But I post it so that you have the opportunity to at least read it and decide for yourself. My bias is obvious, and I may get things wrong from time to time. When I do, enjoy dancing around the smoking ruins, fine with me. But when I'm right, have the goddamn decency to learn something, and to thank us for the help.
Here's some freaking nonsense: Rio Rancho runner collapses during cross country competition
Makes my blood boil. This is child abuse. Putting a mask on an asthmatic cross country runner. Yeah. Makes a lot of sense.
You're clearly not a golfer.
1. The treatments thus far have been for a respiratory affliction, no? What about the ventilators? Do you understand the difference?
2. Do you understand how the "vaccine" works? They describe it in the paper and the Unz article.
3. Do you understand that that summary sentence effectively contradicts the other statements and arguments put forth in the rest of the paper?
Shit, did you even bother reading either the Unz article or the paper?
Thanks for this introducing me to Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, MD. Apparently, he is extremely popular in Germany with the people; unpopular with the Merkel & the medical authorities. Reading the comments of people who follow him closely, they notice the more intense sadness in his eyes in this video. He really believes the mass injection of the world is a horrific catastrophe that will play out over time. Most of his beliefs agree with an underlying theme of this thread: the PCR tests were purposefully cycled up to create a fake pandemic and the "vaccines" are not only unnecessary but also tragically dangerous in the long term.
------
Jonas, did you watch this^ video? All of it? What do you think? If you are convinced Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD is wrong, could you explain why?
What if he's right? Is it worth the risk to assume he is wrong? For a virus that most people get over in a few days? And, we have very effective treatments for the virus. Or, are you also convinced the treatments we've discussed do not work?
I hope you can convince us all that Dr Bhakdi is wrong. Please do so if you can.
I don't think your assertion is completely true. While the mRNA "vaccines" do not directly inject pseudo-spike proteins into your bloodstream, it does not mean that a person does not end up with these pseudo-spike proteins circulating in their bloodstream.
Once the pseudo-spike proteins are produced within cells infected by the "vaccine" (it's also interesting to note that many articles on the subject refer to the cells invaded by the "vaccine" as "vaccinated" rather than truthfully which is to say your cells have been infected) some of the manufactured pseudo-spike proteins are expressed in their entirety on the cell surface while some are segmented into peptides within the cell as part of normal function and those peptides are also expressed on the cell surface. When the immune system reacts and eventually destroys the infected cells, some of those whole pseudo-spike proteins are released into the bloodstream.