It's been recognized for a while that COVID-19 is more of a vascular disease. I haven't looked at the SALK paper.
It's been recognized for a while that COVID-19 is more of a vascular disease. I haven't looked at the SALK paper.
Well, my assertion was completely right.
I'm not getting into how mRNA vaccines are encoded or the etiology of their activity. Your explanation is simply incorrect and borderline nonsensical.
For the record, as stated many pages ago. I believe in mRNA as a potential therapeutic and have invested in a biotech company that is primarily focused on mRNA therapies. I have been a supporter of it as a potential effective therapy for decades based on my experience working with viruses, Immunology and mRNA. But this is my personal view on it and I am totally fine if I am met with disagreement. Doesn't matter, I have satisfied my opinion on my own experience and research. Whether or not mRNA bears out to be a good therapeutic, is irrelevant. I believe it has potential and should be exhausted in R & D.
I need to make this clear: While I believe mRNA has *potential* to be an effective therapeutic, there's a reason it has not been used in a vaccine yet (other than the non-FDA approved "emergency" allowance we have now.) Much more work needs to be done, in addition to the decades of study already. Besides that, I refuse a vaccine for something that is not a fraction of the magnitude of danger we are being told (CV19.)
This guy is a child and doesn't deserve a seat at the grown-ups table. He either cannot read or cannot understand what he reads.
There is no pseudo-spike protein. There is a spike protein. There was a pseudo-virus vector in the research study published by Circulation. The mRNA injections code for the transcribing of the actual spike protein on the SARS CoV2. It causes vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and harm, in mice. These are findings that may have human implications.
This is a good forum. The posts inform decent, interested people and the links are helpful. People posting shouldn't muddy the waters by posting about things they don't understand. Seriously, they're aren't many good sources of information left.
Asking your average physician to go against the CDC, the NIH, the AMA, the AOA and their respective state medical boards is a tall order. Those are institutions, that while never perfect, were institutions until recently we all thought we could rely on. Maybe that was always a fantasy. It certainly seems like it was now.
As a physician, wanting to do the right thing is easy. Knowing what the right thing to do is not. If you cannot rely on your professional and specialty organizations for good information, what have you? Spending hours everyday (in your spare time) combing the internet for the latest study, the latest information on the latest treatment isn't easy. Please don't think someone is feeding physicians the correct information and we are refusing to see it. The information (about vaccine effects and safety, about effective treatments like ivermectin, etc) is being deliberately kept from your average physician. It takes a regular, deliberate effort for a physician to pour over the latest data, information, sifting the wheat from the chaff to make sense of the current state of things. And then what? You get the opportunity to stand and share what you know at your monthly physician meeting with your peers and speak with a lone voice in the crowd. Being the innocent in the crowd calling out that the emperor has no clothes isn't as easy as HC Anderson would make it seem.
To be clear, this guy is an idiot posting as a pseudo-intellectual and should be summarily ignored.
https://media.patriots.win/post/yH1TF0NZ.jpeg
Actual systemic racism that women and non-whites will say absolutely nothing about like usual.
Tucker has summed up everything here. If Fox was aware of this prior to airing, they must be trying to get back some of their demographic that has left them. If Fox did not give the green light on this, Tucker won't have a job much longer.
Tucker Carlson Tonight FULL 5/5/21 FOX BREAKING NEWS May 5, 21 - YouTube
And sloppy (fraudulent) journalism
Giant Bidens, Tiny Carters: A Look at Photographic Distortion - The New York Times
The moron author explains that wide angle lenses make the edges of pictures larger (The Biden’s), then explains how they make the center of the picture larger (Carter’s shoes).
THEN she claims that White House press can not alter photos and therefore they didn’t. Meanwhile, the left gushes on the adorable picture.
IMG_0176.jpg