Thanks again. It's odd that such a decorated, accomplished scientist would conflate data and draw such incorrect conclusions. He has everything to lose and nothing to gain.
One last question for you. Assuming the mRNA technology is moving into other organs & parts of the body (contrary to the original intent?), what do you think about his concerns? My basic understanding is....there could be an autoimmune response to the spike proteins our cells have been taught to create...resulting in organ damage.
Does the mRNA technology replicate? Or does it only "program" a finite number of cells to create spike proteins? I read claims that the mRNA technology creates a permanent change in one's body. How is the programming turned off?
We've covered a lot of material in this thread. Here's a Kary Mullis quote:
Another Mullis quote:
Source:
Dr. KARY MULLIS INVENTOR OF THE PCR TEST USED FOR COVID19. "PCR DOES NOT TELL YOU ARE SICK"
Coming from the PCR inventor and 2020 Nobel Prize recipient, I have to take him seriously.
However, in trying to understand the other side of this argument...I found this partial recant of a Reuter's Fact Check that claimed the above quote isn't true. Take a look at the logical prezel this article presents:
Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn’t say it can’t be used in virus detection
And, based on this 1984 "double speak" ^above^, Australia going to require a weekly negative PCR test (at who knows what cycles) to
earn the right to leave your house.
----
Watch this 12 minute overview of the movie, 1984 for a good laugh:
Oceania | 1984
They've executed every detail of that novel.
---
Emergency Use Authorization depends on the answer to this question. There are now pharmacists refusing to administer the vaccines on grounds that alternative therapies exist.