Tucker went into a rather unexpected direction the other day, with his piece about the plan of the establishment to change the demographic core of the United States through mass immigration. Of course, he was criticizing the implicit eugenics of the Left, and calling them "the real racists" - but he did also speak about "heritage Americans". That was followed by the very next day by Charlie Kirk who talked about the left's war on the white demographic of the US. It's quite an understatement to call this a turn-around for Kirk, as just a few years ago he was having people thrown out of his live events for asking questions about race.
There was also a congressman who was talking in explicitly racial terms. Is this just the conservative right trying to recuperate itself, and talk about things they should have talked about years ago? I'm not sure. It's hard to not be overly cynical about things these days. What effect does it really have on some guy just watching the TV Man talk about demographic change and The Great Replacement? What does a person who is hearing this message do with that?
I do get a sense of more and more people seeing through all these things (vax ID's, mass immigration, the latest reports of long-term economic malaise/inflation/monetary reset/corporate power grab), though.
This man speaks common sense!
Dr. Scott Atlas on Vaccine Mandates for Children, Natural Immunity, and Florida’s COVID-19 Surge
Just learned that the Parkview Hospital system in my area is administering rt-PCR tests with the Roche Cobas 6800 instrument, configured by the mfg with ct = 40. Apparently, doctors/nurses/lab techs do not set the ct threshold.
It seems difficult to produce a false negative with ct = 40, but easy to produce a false positive. Correct?
Just change cell phone to mRNA device...schadenfreude!
The Cell Phone Zombies
Humanity has regressed since the 1960s. Too bad one has to be old to see the change.
Advice: if you must, get one of these: Unihertz - Jelly 2
It can be rooted and loaded with custom ROM sans The Google (GApps). It will curtail your addiction.
That's pretty good.
A lovely little trick. They are scared now.The study showed an astronomically high rate of miscarriage for pregnant women who received the vaccine in the first two trimesters. They worked hard to obscure the danger.
The table below, of birth outcomes, shows that of the 827 women with completed pregnancies, 104 miscarried before 20 weeks gestation. As you can see, by using a denominator of 827 they can claim a miscarriage rate of 12.6%. However, in the fine print below the table, we learn that 700 of the women received the vaccine in the third trimester. This means that 127 women received the vaccine in the first and second trimesters and 104 of 127 or 82% of those women miscarried. By using a denominator of 827 rather than 127, they made the vaccine seem safe for all pregnant women.
Additionally, the number of pregnant women after the 104 miscarriages is 723, not 725. After the one stillbirth, the remaining viable pregnancies are 722, not 724.4
Italy is hardly the focus of anyone's attention.