This is both wrong and correct at the same time.
All the steps that lead Draghi to his current position were done according to the Italian Constitution and were perfectly legal. En passant, the same procedure was used in 2011 for Mario Monti, and even further back, when personnel from the Bank of Italy received the same mandate as Draghi.
As in 2011, the President of the Italian Republic bears the responsibility for this state of affairs.
Of course, the fact that the whole procedure was legally above board doesn't exclude that the result is indeed a massive distortion of democratic process, essentially a coup. This is not surprising either. The rise to power of both Mussolini and Hitler took place within the legal framework of the time, which also provided for the emergency power legislation they eventually enacted to retain power until their demise.
IPB
Actual reality result of AZ audit
Why Totalitarians Promote Hate | Kate Wand - YouTube
Holocaust survivors supporting a criminal investigation into the plandemic: Law + Human Rights - World Freedom Alliance UK
I guess if there are no other good options to prevent ICU overruns, then yes I am pro lockdown. And I prefer that over vaccine mandates, which is being posed as the alternative. But both of these options suck.
Doing nothing also seemed incorrect at the beginning (not now). If ICUs fill, then those without covid that need that space will die. And once the ICUS are full, the collateral deaths go exponential (see Queue theory). There was a point in the pandemic where Ontario was skirting with the idea of "triage" rules, that basically required doctors to choose who gets care based on their overall longterm death risk. I guess Trump had a good idea when he sent that ship to NY and built temporary ICU capacity. Something like this was never even discussed in Canada. I am not sure if our tiny army could have pulled it off at a national scale if the country had just let the virus rampant without any lockdowns.
Am I missing something? Do you have a better alternative? If all options are bad, do you just take the principle of most freedom wins? What's your thoughts? I clearly don't have a good answer.
Giamperod, stop typing for a while and read this: "Damn You To Hell, You Will Not Destroy America" - Here Is The '''Spartacus COVID Letter''' That'''s Gone Viral | ZeroHedge