Yes, Australia, that's where you're headed. Better read this while you can: Accountability in [Market-Ticker-Nad]
Australian Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk says quarantine facilities are going to be needed for the unvaccinated.
The Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk issues a threat to the People! - YouTube
Yes, Australia, that's where you're headed. Better read this while you can: Accountability in [Market-Ticker-Nad]
I don’t think this holds up. Consider that COVID occurred during the Trump era. Israel switching the dialog from Iran to Covid, clearly hurt Trump. So now Israel has the Covid insanity IN ADDITION to a nuclear Iran. Lose-lose. Had Covid occurred after Trump lost, it Covid could have been a convenient diversion.
Very American centric I know.
More than 100 top nuclear scientists with "highest security clearances" being fired from Los Alamos Lab due to vaccine mandate | Tech News | Startups News
BREAKING: COMCAST CENSORS VAX INJURED 13-YR.-OLD GIRL WHO VOLUNTEERED FOR PFIZER TRIAL - CD Media
One of the theories offered by Geert Vanden Bossche and Malone
Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens
A few things:
https://mobile.twitter.com/govrondes...47185357332481 "The more Florida acts like a country right now, the better for all of us." This is true of every state in the country. And we're headed in that direction.
https://mobile.twitter.com/thesun/st...39594940084230 Almost.
Deleted Government Report Celebrates How Public Loves to “Conform” – Summit News And it works very well, especially in the UK and Australia.
And this is juicy:“Government statements, actions and laws powerfully shape perceptions of normative and acceptable behaviour. For instance, even with public criticism being high, many still perceived government approval as the yardstick for safe behaviour during COVID-19 ‘we’re allowed to do this now [so must be safe]…’. This reveals, for many, a deep set reverence for legitimate government authority, regardless of one’s personal political views.”
There has never been a shortage of 1.) stupid people and 2.) thugs who want to beat them up for tyrannies to use. Tyranny is facilitated by these two groups.A related group, the Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours team, warned at the start of the first lockdown that a “substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened [by Covid-19].”
“The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging,” the group added, leading to numerous lurid propaganda campaigns that exaggerated the threat of COVID to bully the public into total submission.
In summary, the public is largely unthinking, compliant and docile and can be made to go along with just about anything so long as they’re bombarded with the right propaganda.
And what happens when the tyranny ceases to be able to enable you to flush your toilet? Here It Comes: Supply Dislocation in [Market-Ticker]
It’s a bad conclusion. Depopulation of maybe 10% (about a billion or more), would be required.
Sterilization would get the needed numbers but much slower. Probably decades.
Overt incentivized sterilization might have been less expensive and more effective. $100k tax free for a male and $20k for a female? Including citizenship keeps the labor and tax base high.
But,…., none of that happened.
and that is why Israel is talking about the 4th dose already Virus czar calls to begin readying for eventual 4th vaccine dose | The Times of Israel
I was listening to a recent Dave Smith podcast (relevant discussion starts at 9:30), and was reminded of the pedantic libertarianism I sometimes see pop up here. I transcribed some excerpts (minus verbal ticks and false starts):
I especially like the Daniel McAdams heuristic.Dave: But I gotta tell you, I'm okay with [Governor Abbott's mandate ban]. And it's been an interesting thing to kind of think this through, and realize that you know, whether this is perfectly libertarian or not (and the answer is, it's not), we don't live in a perfect libertarian world, and we live in a real threat right now to liberty in this country. And seeing people fight back against it kinda makes me happy, and I'm not going to spend any time complaining about it.
...
Robbie: There's also already anti-discrimination laws imposed on businesses, so for a new anti-descrimination law to come around that's actually in my favor... Unless you're going to unwind the other protections that other people have, you're really just extending protections that already existing. So for example if they made an anti-descrimination law [for] conservative point of views or your political opinions, that you can't be fired from your employer because of your politcal views as stated online: Would it be smart of libertarians to say "How dare you tell a business they can't discriminate against employees!" Well, those laws already exist, so why wouldn't I want that protection for myself when it's already afforded multiple other individuals? It just doesn't seem like a winning strategy when the other side of it's not going away.
Dave: Yeah, exactly. Or you could just make it explicitly agaisnt libertarians. [Let's say] there's a federal edict that says anyone who opposes the federal reserve is a terrorist and should be fired. And then one state's governor says "You're not allowed to fire someone for being against the federal reserve." Would we sit there and go "Well those are both infringements on liberty!", or would we just say, you know even if none of this if perfect, I'm kinda on the side of that guy.
...
Dave: Daniel McAdams, who is Ron Paul's co-host on the Liberty Report. He had this thing he used to say, and I'm not saying it's a hundred percent perfect law, but there's really something to this: "Libertarians should never be useful to the regime." [In the foreign policy context, for example], he'd say "Never attack the CIA's targeted enemies". ... And you see this a lot from different libertarians, and it's hard exactly to decide whether you should give them the benefit of the doubt and [say], you guys are really, really blue-pilled. Or this is a little more nefarious than that and you're actually trying to aid the regime. You're either blue-pilled libertarians or regime-libertarians. I'm not sure which is worse. ... What is the real threat to liberty? That we're going to go down this road where we have a two tiered system where anybody who didn't take the COVID vaccination is now a second class citizen, [and in fact] mandated by the governments that they are second-class citizens. Or that governments will come in and say you can't do that? ... The fact that I even see libertarians arguing about this stuff is kind of nuts to me.
...
Dave: I understand the libertarian allergy to state power. We don't want to use state power. That's kind of the whole thing we're against. And I get that, and I'm against that too. ... I feel like when people say "that's bad, but that's bad too, and we're against all of these state policies." Do you guys not understand the moment we're living through? ... If you do understand that, then I think maybe you'd realize the solution probably won't be perfect, but anyone who [might be able to] take down the COVID regime, I'm willing to hear them out.
Boris Johnson is such an embarrassment. The dude should just jab himself to death and be done with his miserable existence.