starting strength gym
Page 1728 of 3004 FirstFirst ... 72812281628167817181726172717281729173017381778182822282728 ... LastLast
Results 17,271 to 17,280 of 30035

Thread: COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events

  1. #17271
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    620

    Default

    • starting strength seminar april 2024
    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    Quote Originally Posted by wal View Post
    That interview with W.A. Mark McGowen on Sky News Australia on Oct. 31. It is about the pressure on Australian Hospitals with the influx of older patients. Mainly from old folks who are in hospital due to the lack of nursing home beds. Complications from covid on the older folk filled the ICU's and critical beds so that elective surgeries were being delayed. It is all about putting pressure on the federal government to provide more funding.

    Sky News Australia - Western Australia Premier Mark McGowan provides a COVID-19 update
    There are two possibilities.

    1 - The hospitals are overwhelmed with cardiac cases and vaccine injured which take up beds, as they are having every test known to man administered. Primarily because no-one knows, or even wants to know how to treat vaccine injured. I can tell you that Aussie paramedics are on record saying there is a massive spike in cardiac calls.

    2 - They are under pressure as a result of the cancellation of nearly all elective and routine medical/screening care over the last couple of years. I don't live in his state, but I've done a rotation in his sister states main hospital last year, the Covid ward was empty, as was entire floors that had been cleared out for covid cases that never came.

    In reality it's probably a mix of the two, but either one is his fault.




    Quote Originally Posted by Juris View Post
    Fuck the stupid deer people. Let them get smashed. Fuck 'em!
    What do we do apart from saying "muh guns" on forums?
    I mean it sincerely.
    What do we do apart from protests which seem to land nowhere, because these corrupt fucks control the narrative and the stupid fucks just nod their stupid little heads?
    Short answer:
    Personally, raise better kids, as many as you can.

    Long answer:
    Days of Rage | Status 451
    This (long) link is sobering because it highlights just how far behind the "right" is. Australia gets a lot of flak (rightly deserved) because we gave up our guns, but by themselves, having 300 million firearms isn't, or hasn't done jack to save the US. If you think it's a war, and you should, then think strategically. The enemy gets a vote too. If you think you'll "shoot them when they come to your house" you are a fool that lost in fantasy. They won't come for you, they will ramp up societal pressure, they will turn your friends and family against you, isolate you, shrink numbers as people will give up, and finally, if they have too, they'll get you when you leave your home. I'm assuming you don't take your arsenal when you go food shopping.

    Everyone has their own boogeyman as to the fundamental cause, but for me the largest (but not he only one) is marxism. And specifically the kgb active measures program.
    There's been a few defectors from the cold war, the most well known is Yuri Bezmenov:
    Search - BitChute
    Pick your favourite clips to watch but he explains what his job was, how it works and the progression of it.

    This is largely disbelieved and ignored in the west. (Now this is my own crazy hypothesis so feel free to disregard) Because of a psychological blindspot we have in the west. To us, we see a problem, and we solve it. The act of defeating a problem or an enemy is an overt one. We see the enemy, we fight the enemy, and it’s won or lost and then the story is closed. But we only think that way because of an abundance of history where that’s worked. We’ve had the power and resources that we can solve our problems directly. There’s a heavy stone, you just pick it up with your own strength.

    But there is more than one way to skin a cat. Imagine that you weren’t physically strong enough to move the stone. How would you move it? You would have to move it indirectly, which opens up a whole new world of possibilities of problem solving. You can use tools to create a fulcrum and long lever, you can convince someone else to do it, you can change your mind about wanting to move it, you can dig underneath it so you can roll it, hell, you can even make a flowing river to erode it away in a thousand years. If you remove the requirement to immediately and overtly “solve” the problem of the rock, hell you can just sit there and let entropy do its thing.
    Another, more visual metaphor of this blind spot would be “How would you beat Mike Tyson, in his prime, in a boxing match?” The answer is you couldn’t. There is no solution as to how you, would beat Mike Tyson in boxing. So the answer is then, you don’t. The way to win is to convince Mike Tyson to quit boxing and take up knitting. Start by befriending him, convince him to miss a training or two, tell him about the injuries and long term prognosis of CTE, start seeding the idea that knitting is fun etc etc. When you’ve weakened him enough, he quits boxing. Then you win.

    The reason I went off on this long tangent is because that is how the Soviet union fought (and won) the cold war. They were never able to overtly defeat the US and NATO, and I believed they knew it. I’m most of the way through “love letter to America” which is a book Yuri Bezmenov wrote about the specific activities of subversion he took to weaken the US. Subversion, or active measures was designed to slowly weaken the US, simple, indirect methods like paying writers to write pro soviet articles. (Akin to convincing mike tysons friend to invite him out for a beer instead of training)

    There was actually 4 stages to this, Demoralisation, Destabilisation, Crisis, and Normalization where the Soviet Union would invade. If you review the countries that fell to communism you can see this in action. The closest the US got was the wave of Marxist terrorism in the 70’s, which was explained in the first link. But it didn’t result on revolution for a variety of reasons, mainly because the US was strong enough to resist it, at the time.
    However the threat didn’t go away, it merely retreated to academia, and started churning out grievance studies who’s only job was to replicate themselves. This is like to wanting to burn down a distant city, but you lack the ability to do so. So the best way is to teach a bunch of people how to teach other people to start fires. Since you live by a coast, there’s only one direction people can move, towards the city. And you know what they will be taught to do, because you taught their teachers. The city burning is only a matter of time. Since it’s now filled with arsonists. Whilst the KGB no longer exists to directly fund these people, they’ve switched to public funds and private philanthropists (Soros, gates, mackensize bezos etc) to fund their activities. Activities which are designed to weaken the US. If you think you can stop it now, you are far more optimistic than I.


    Fortunately this is where the black pill ends, and I do have a white pill.


    Remember history and civilization is cyclical. Strong Men create good times, good times create Weak Men, Weak Men create bad times, Bad times create Strong Men. Secondly, the 4 stage process cannot move to normalization as there is no Soviet Union, or any other power that can move in to normalize society. So it merely loops through the first 2 stages along with the occasional normal random crisis. (The Soviet solution to these useful idiots was simply to kill them first, they had no plan or even desire to deprogram them.)
    This means that the subverted population (Yuri defined them as having consumed enough nonsense and demoralization propaganda to no longer be able to accurately parse reality) enter a positive feedback loop of spiraling insanity. This actually helps, as the US is very divided across various cultural lines, which provides an innoculative effect.
    The truly demoralized are trapped in a CNN/academic/cult bubble that is hostile to outsiders which creates a 1 way release valve. No-one enters the silo of crazy, they just leave. While it currently causes an issue because the public education system is part of it, meaning that by default, people are born into it. This can change. It’s also a collapsing, self hating bubble. By and large, the subverted bubble do not reproduce in significant numbers.
    Inevitably this will weaken and collapse the host civilization, as it was designed to do. However once it does, there will be significant numbers of citizens that existed outside this bubble, and watched as it collapsed half the country. Absent a foreign power with the ability to colonise, this bloc will be in a prime position to rebuild.

    This is where you can do something. Use the enemies strategies against them, engage in strategic warfare over a longer time frame. Generational warfare. Have 3 or more kids, home school them, or at least inoculate them against school propaganda, and prepare them to assume the mantle of rebuilding.

    Sorry for the long post but it’s obviously something that I’ve thought about quite a bit.

  2. #17272
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Grantham View Post
    The SARS-CoV 2 vaccines may not be as good at preventing severe disease as 4 doses of the Salk vaccine is, but they do a good enough job that I would not agree that they are failed vaccines.
    Ivermectin? Why is this "vaccine" necessary? Surely you know by now the risks of the vaccine.

  3. #17273
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Grantham View Post
    . . .
    The SARS-CoV 2 vaccines may not be as good at preventing severe disease as 4 doses of the Salk vaccine is, but they do a good enough job that I would not agree that they are failed vaccines.
    I am genuinely interested in where you look for evidence of this.

  4. #17274
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    53,559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VNV View Post
    I am genuinely interested in where you look for evidence of this.
    There is a huge amount of evidence he is not able to access (the Pfizer data that the FDA will not release for decades), and the accelerating deaths among vaccinated younger people that he is willing to ignore.

  5. #17275
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    There is a huge amount of evidence he is not able to access (the Pfizer data that the FDA will not release for decades), and the accelerating deaths among vaccinated younger people that he is willing to ignore.
    I've been following Peter McCullough lately and find him compelling. The vaccines seem irrelevant, at best. Where does the admin's confidence in "they work" come from? Other than their asses.

  6. #17276
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subby View Post
    There are two possibilities.

    1 - The hospitals are overwhelmed with cardiac cases and vaccine injured which take up beds, as they are having every test known to man administered. Primarily because no-one knows, or even wants to know how to treat vaccine injured. I can tell you that Aussie paramedics are on record saying there is a massive spike in cardiac calls.

    2 - They are under pressure as a result of the cancellation of nearly all elective and routine medical/screening care over the last couple of years. I don't live in his state, but I've done a rotation in his sister states main hospital last year, the Covid ward was empty, as was entire floors that had been cleared out for covid cases that never came.In reality it's probably a mix of the two, but either one is his fault.
    That is certainly interesting. I am currently involved with the State Emergency Service and I do know that the Paramedics are being run off their feet. We do attend to OHCA as first responders as the SES have units all over the states in the regions where the Ambulance response can be slow due to the distances to these remote areas.

    Can you give me a link to the info from point 1?

  7. #17277
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    There is a huge amount of evidence he is not able to access (the Pfizer data that the FDA will not release for decades), and the accelerating deaths among vaccinated younger people that he is willing to ignore.
    Don't forget about myo and pericarditis. Before this year, no one knew what this disease was except for cardiologists and it was considered rather serious. Now it appears that it is just a part of normal life's occurrence that kids get the heart of an 90 year old from a "safe and effective" intervention, to the extent that we have to be reminded with billboards that "children get heart attacks too".

    And the studies that say that it happens extremely rarely is utter bullshit. I don't care what statistical analysis you pull from your ass, because when you see this happening to the fittest people in the world in the middle of a game for all to see, then you know something bad is happening. It was super rare for an athlete to have a heart attack in the middle of a game prior to last year. Now, it's a super common occurrence.
    And by the way, we were not seeing this happen when it was just the virus going around before the vaccines came out, regardless of what the "literature" says.

  8. #17278
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wal View Post
    That is certainly interesting. I am currently involved with the State Emergency Service and I do know that the Paramedics are being run off their feet. We do attend to OHCA as first responders as the SES have units all over the states in the regions where the Ambulance response can be slow due to the distances to these remote areas.

    Can you give me a link to the info from point 1?
    Aussie Nurses, Paramedics, and Health Workers speak out about COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries (Short)

  9. #17279
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,377

    Default

    Heroes!
    Another Unvaccinated Nurse Escorted From The Hospital - YouTube

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BBC has admitted what we've always known - reporting on a Lancet study they showed that ‘Individuals who have had two vaccine doses can be just as infectious as those who have not been jabbed’.

    Numerous studies have shown this to be the case. Some also contradict the claim that vaccinated individuals are less likely to test positive.

    We have been told over and over again to ‘get vaccinated to protect others as well as yourself’. This was the whole basis on which vaccine passports were sold to the public.

    But these finding cannot be seen to hamper the rollout, so now instead of being told everyone must get vaccinated because it prevents transmission, we’re told everyone must be vaccinated because it DOESN’T prevent transmission.

    “Unvaccinated people cannot rely on those around them being jabbed to remove their risk of getting infected, [the researchers] warn.”

    But that was never the reason for not getting vaccinated. If you choose not to get vaccinated, it’s because you’ve done a rational risk calculation. You calculate that the downside (short-term adverse effects and unknown long-term risks, and limited, waning immunity) doesn’t outweigh the risks of getting Covid, recovering, and enjoying longer-lasting immunity. That risk balance is different for every individual. For example the risk from Covid for healthy children and young adults is vanishingly small.

    “Double jabbed people are catching Covid and passing it on to those they live with,” warns the BBC. Of course, but also in all other settings.

    Why won’t the BBC draw the obvious conclusion from it’s own story – that vaccine passports cannot work?

    Covid: Double vaccinated can still spread virus at home - BBC News

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Telegram: Contact @pandata19
    The FDA have published their reasoning behind justifying the vaccination of children aged 5 to 11 years old. They provide estimates of risk of ICU admissions and deaths, in hypothetical future Covid waves, against the guaranteed risk from myocarditis if vaccination is carried out (see table).

    The FDA claims that vaccination could prevent between 60 and 80 ICU admissions per million children aged 5 to 11 in just a 6-month period. That is 6-8 times the admission rate seen in the UK.

    Yet of those ICU admissions, only 30% had a positive test before arriving in ICU. Another half had severe comorbidities. The Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) say “These children may not primarily be in ICU because of Covid-19 but all tested positive to the virus either prior to or during their ICU admission.”

    For the FDA to reach this conclusion in recommending vaccines to children, the following assumptions must have been made:

    1. Natural immunity in those children infected does not exist
    2. There is no such thing as hospital transmission to children who are already sick for another reason
    3. Children with comorbidities are at no greater risk than healthy children
    4. Vaccination can prevent the vast majority of ICU admissions
    5. There is no vaccine waning in children

    These assumptions are so extreme that presenting the data in this way to create a case for vaccinating healthy children amounts to negligence if not outright fraud.

    The UK's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) were more careful in their calculations. They estimated only the risk for otherwise healthy 12 to 17 year olds (a healthy child admitted to intensive care for another cause, e.g. meningitis, who then contracted Covid in hospital would be counted as a preventable Covid admission).

    They concluded that giving all 2.7 million 12-15 year olds in England one dose might prevent 7 ICU admissions of healthy children. Given the risks of vaccination they felt they could not recommend vaccinating this age group.

    The figure the FDA use for the risk of myocarditis is 1 in 10,000 with a third requiring intensive care. There is a good deal of evidence that this figure is a large underestimate. Yet even on their own figures, the risk of intensive care admission for males due to post vaccination myocarditis is of the same order as the allegedly prevented intensive care admissions.

    Worse still, no consideration has been taken as to the longer term impact of myocarditis nor what effect priming the immune system with vaccination has on myocarditis rates in those children who then encounter the virus.
    In the words of the FDA itself: “Information is not yet available about potential long-term sequelae and outcomes in affected individuals, or whether the vaccine might be associated initially with subclinical myocarditis (and if so, what are the long-term sequelae).”

    And myocarditis is not the only adverse reaction to which children who are vaccinated will be exposed.

    The decision to vaccinate children is reckless and the way the data has been presented as representing the risk to healthy children, is, whether deliberately or not, fraudulent.

    Read this article, with links to the underlying data, on the HART website under ‘News’.

    https://www.fda.gov/media/153447/download

  10. #17280
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    431

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by VNV View Post
    I've been following Peter McCullough lately and find him compelling. The vaccines seem irrelevant, at best. Where does the admin's confidence in "they work" come from? Other than their asses.
    It's not confidence, it's total obedience to three letter organisations based in Geneva. The British gov was all about herd immunity until the WHO said otherwise. At that precise moment they did a complete 180 and began pushing the vaccine propaganda. They are not in control.

    These same three letter organisations are the ones who wasted no time in telling us this whole ordeal is actually just a happy coincidence (despite their pandemic simulation a month or so before COVID was actually born), and it is in fact the perfect opportunity (no, the very last chance we have!) to reshape society and eliminate inequality and pursue a sustainable, progressive future where you'll own nothing, rent everything, essentially be a serf and feel like an alien in your own homeland, and YOU WILL BE HAPPY. A happy little drone in your rabbit-hutch city apartment, driving to work in your tiny, leased electric vehicle, eating meat once a week if you're lucky.

    They need to keep COVID-19 and vaccinations and public health at the forefront of people's minds just a tiny bit longer. If the smoke-screen of COVID-19 clears *before* the inevitable debt exposion, economic pain & monetary reset, then what would have been the point? A relatively small amount of the vaccinated dropping dead or becoming vaccine injured doesn't worry them.

    At that point, these experts will ramp-up The Great Reset rhetoric. Right now they're just showing us teaser-trailers before the final release.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •