I wouldn't know enough to confidently make a prediction, but aren't green technologies, generally speaking, a bust. There are hard physical limits to the amount of energy that can be stored and transferred between mediums. And it turns out chemical reactions from burning coal, oil and gas are actually pretty good, and the mediums are stable and transportable. If you put a litre (or a gallon) of fuel in a car and drive it till it stops. It's going to be a huge task to push the car the same distance.
It would be a stunning oversight that our overlords misunderstand the physical constraints on energy and believe that the world can transition to renewable energy. So what is their plan? Are they going to continue this "green energy" veneer? They just called a coal-fired power station green because it has some turbines contributing an extra 20% to it's output.
Yes, as history has shown, Rich Man's War, Poor Man's Blood.
Probably not this one, never mind geometry or physics:
Congresswoman Demonstrates 'Worst Parking Job Ever' - YouTube
This is Pelosi's top pick for Transportation Secretary by the way, and this video is from 7 years ago! Imagine how sharp this old bat is now at 84 years old.
Way back in time, CBS 60 Minutes did a piece on "phages". They were permitted access to Soviet labs, and as I remember things, the information was a revelation.
My google fu has not been able to find the video. I want to say it was a piece by Mike Wallace, late 70's early 80's
Isn't this how it always has worked historically? Soften up the population up with a pandemic, plunder the financial resources of the country, then move on to war? I think we are right on schedule.
Matt, you left out the part where Larry Fink invented securitized mortgages, which led to the 2008 financial implosion, then was oddly selected by the Bush administration to manage trillions of dollars of government stimulus to fix (profit from) the problem he had created.
The obvious and important question this raises is: Does Rip still wear pants?
I agree with what the others have said, but add I have read about the treatments in former soviet republics being effective and cheap in many cases.
There have been several attempts to start bacteriophage companies in the US, but FDA clinical trials are a huge obstacle: Antibiotics are considered a safe, effective, approved therapy, so the pool of potential trial participants is limited to the sickest patients, who do not respond to antibiotics. Under these circumstances, it becomes much more expensive and much more difficult to demonstrate efficacy in FDA clinical trials (Analogous to studies treating patients with Ivermectin only after they have developed secondary bacterial pneumonia and been placed on a ventilator,.
This, in my view is one of the primary mistakes people make when analyzing the situation; As the Russians say, "Russia needs a czar" and Americans need freedom.
A system of government must take into account the inherent characteristics of the population
with a strong emphasis on genetic predispositions.
This is why attempts to replicate political movements of the past often fail. For example, I believe Dugan's NazBol philosophy was doomed to fail from the start for the simple reason that Russians are not Germans.
In addition, it would imply a highly likely relationship between the vaccine and other diseases associated with latent or dormant viruses.
Unfortunately no one takes notice of the BMJ.
Do you have a source for this statement?
I do see a scenario where they will put a pause on the green pass. Regarding Pegasus however, (which probably has been going on for years) this will never be stopped.
Up until the US Immigration Act in 1965, the US was 90% genetically European. In 2020 it was 60%. The United States of 2022 is a very, very different place than that of our parents and grandparents. The trend suggests that by 2040, those of European genetic predisposition will make up less than half the US population. I am not making a value judgement on that, simply stating the fact that the US will more closely resemble the demographics of Brazil than that of the United States of 1960.