I haven't been able to find the connection yet, but it could be possible that Jens Stoltenberg is related somehow to Senior Project Manager GAZPROM Germania, Axel Stoltenberg. https://de.linkedin.com/in/axel-stoltenberg-5762b037
When I first read the headline, instead of reading the word vacationers, I mistakenly read it as vaccinationers. I think I probably was correct in my original reading.
'Sudden and Unexpected': At least 11 Vacationers Drop Dead on Italian Beaches in 24 hours - RAIR
BBC's 'independent vaccine expert' just happens to be in charge of Pfizer's Vaccine Centre
--------
Robert W Malone MD
As we are learning more about how Dr. Deborah Birx was at the center of the horrible coronavirus policies that have so deeply damaged the US and world, a key question is what ties existed/exist between her and the BMGF. This clip appears to demonstrate a Freudian slip. We already know that both she and Bob Redfield was put into their positions by Matt Mowers acting via his connections with Mike Pence consequent to the Bush/PEPFAR program. We also know from her own book that she consciously used Sanjay Gupta to validate her. It is quite likely that she has deep ties with BMGF. Frankly, things seem to keep pointing back to Bill Gates as central to so much of what went wrong.
Freudian slip by Dr. Birx during CNN interview - YouTube
----------
Deceit requires the malicious intent to be hidden.
This is the essay on repressive tolerance that guides the majority of progressive ideology currently. It was openly published and this guy told everyone about it.
Repressive Tolerance (full text) - Herbert Marcuse Official Website
This Is Bill Ayers, leader of a terrorist group that tried to overthrow the US government to create a maoist communist state in the US.
Bill Ayers - Wikipedia
He “retired” from terrorism along with his wife and fellow bomber straight into academia. He bombed the pentagon and the capitol building. Actually bombed it, not just walked in after being let in.
There is no hiding.
Every marxist will openly tell you that they want to “seize the means of production” and follow the philosophy of marx and engels. What do you think “seizing” means? They are more than happy to tell you that it means abolishing private property and creating a communist state. If someone tells you they are a marxist they are telling you that their goal is to overthrow the country and replace it with a hellish utopia. There is nothing secret about it. Every aspect of their appearance, personality and speech screams their intentions. Deceit is not a word found in most marxists existence. There is no deceit, there is only opening the door for them and ignoring them.
I do not allow any forgiveness of older generations for not ensuring the idea of marxism was thoroughly and comprehensively dismantled and the next generation inoculated against the insidious disease that it is. The world is like it is because people allowed it to happen.
Patton had the right idea in identifying the real enemy.
China: Just How Stable Is China's Economy and Society Right Now? | National Review
It's actually worse than this, according to my sources. They are facing a very bad food supply situation that there's really no way out of. Many people, including people who know more about this than me, have said that if they want Taiwan back, they can just take it, because this is the weakest administration in the history of the US, and our military can't really do anything except that which it will not do -- launch a first strike. But the situation in China may very well be bad enough that they simply can't pull it off right now. And things will be very different after November -- one way or another. Their window may have already closed.
Denninger is right in this, I am surprised you guys haven’t mentioned it yet. I guess we are past the saturation point of corruption, so people don’t notice everything: If There Is No Recourse To The Law.... in [Market-Ticker]
You appear to have missed the context of what I wrote in that post. The reason I talked about women's right to vote was not to rank the United States comparatively to other countries. It was to point out how much the world has changed over the passed 100 years. I could also easily point out that there are still people alive today who drank from separate water fountains than the "colored folk". I don't want to go back and live in the world that existed 100 years ago. I would prefer to see continued progress.
Let's forget for a part about the supposed voter fraud. Normally one would require some evidence of this happening, but I guess we will just have to wait for that "my pillow" guy to show it to us. I also don't recall saying anything about the "bodies strewn on the steps of the Capitol". However you seem to be suggesting that nothing occurred on January 6th. I'm guessing your perspective of the situation would be quite different if black lives matter showed up on the steps of the Capitol. But once again, you can believe what you want, I'm not trying to change your opinion.
With that said, what was the context of what the man was saying in regards to this not being the same country he fought for. Was he fighting for progress in the country, or was he fighting for a country where colored boys weren't allowed to drink from the same water fountain as him? I watched the video several times and honestly couldn't tell you. The truth is you can't tell me either. It appears as though you are just blindly accepting propaganda so you can make your own truths.
BTW, it is also readily obvious that you were merely copying someone else's response to me which also missed the point. Maybe learn to think for yourself in your arguments before posting your next wikipedia link.
Denying an obviously genocidal process is not something to be proud of, even if you feel it benefits you personally or your religion.
It was related to what you said, but not directed at you.
This is a good question.
Things appear very chaotic within China right now, even by current western standards on chaos.