Originally Posted by
Jason Donaldson
Full disclosure - I have a degree in philosophy. I had started intending to major in engineering, but started as an undisciplined young idiot, who shouldn't have gone straight to college... Point being, I had the qualifications for either a BS or a BA, including three semesters of calculus and a very good overall mathematics and science background.
Philosophy courses should teach the ability to think and the habit of thinking. Certainly, they can...but it really varies. I had a handful of outstanding professors, and I loved those classes. However, a lot of the classes fill general breadth requirements, and tend to be filled with maddeningly banal interlocutors. Moreover, people majoring in philosophy include a significant subset who are pursuing the major merely as pre-business or pre-law, and in my experience, they were some of the worst with regards of not wanting to actually engage their brain housing groups.
With a good instructor modelling, requiring, and inspiring rigor in the field of study, the benefits become immense, and far exceed the direct scope of the subject material. Likewise, a student accepting and leaning into rigorous study can reap great benefits, even without such an instructor. Sadly, both roles were not exactly full of such folks...
I am saddened that mathematics is sounding similar. The two fields, at their best, overlap more than many realize.