Thanks for these suggestions. It seems likely that you are correct about removing parts 2 and 3, and perhaps other parts, too. I'm open to paring it down. I erred on the side of being comprehensive. I will be making a pitch to the academic dean for this class and more detail will be helpful to impress upon them the value of the course.
If I were to start teaching the class right now, I would need to be prepared to leave some of these objectives on the cutting room floor and have thought ahead of time about what should be the highest priority and what could get the axe if we are running short of time. I'm shooting for the ideal with this document and am fully prepared to take your advice by cutting out things which a little lower on the totem pole of importance. We are a classical school and so the class as I have it on this document is arranged to fulfill the academic philosophy of our school. The "why" is important to us. But the "why" need not always be as detailed as it could be. We would not expect SSC level mastery. They are only high schoolers after all, and if they are interested in the material they can certainly study in more detail on their own time.
Regarding the NLP, I want the main component of the class to be to teach the students to get stronger and facilitate that for them. If we could only do one thing, it would be to lift barbells and grow stronger, even if they learned nothing else. I would estimate a total of 20ish students to opt into a weightlifting program. We are a very small school and not all grades have a PE block in their schedule. I would anticipate a slow start to the class. Perhaps the first couple of weeks being instruction and close observation of each lifter. After that, I would estimate that most students will probably be able to perform most of the lifts without someone watching their every rep. But they will still get regular feedback as a coach will be present at every workout. I do not have rose-colored glasses about the students. Many, if not most, will apply themselves to an NLP inconsistently or in a mediocre fashion. There will be some who do very well and they may inspire others to get on it. But, I know from personal experience that even an undisciplined student who does a mediocre job with a decent strength program can still have life-altering results, even if they do fall short of their potential. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing poorly. Hopefully we can begin to build a culture that values strength and then we can get more students to try and do it well.
I am of like mind about the lecture notes, also. While I think it would be great if they all read the blue book, our school is very academically heavy and they have an excess of reading to do in other classes already. So I would need to distill down to the minimum useful knowledge and prepare handouts for anything I would want to quiz them on or have them memorize. I would not anticipate much of that though. I would hope the knowledge can be presented in a way that is constantly reinforced by life in the gym. For instance, they may need to study the names and locations of muscles, but I hope we are naturally using those terms in the weight room as we discuss the lifts anyway.
Thanks again for your feedback. It's already helping.