I'm curious if any of you have put any effort into performing a risk/reward assessment of each CDC recommended childhood vaccine. I've performed fewer than 10 hours of research and here are my placeholder conclusions, which I'm open to changing if I've gotten any of the details wrong or am missing an important part of the equation:
- C19 - Most dangerous "vaccine" in the history of VAERs. Healthy infants/toddlers don't die of C19.
- Hep B - No risk of exposure in childhood.
- Rotavirus - Seems like a non-issue for babies that are breastfeeding and aren't immunocompromised.
- Polio - No risk of exposure.
- Diptheria - No US deaths in 30+ years.
- Tetanus - No exposure risk at this stage of life.
- Pertussis - If it were a standalone vaccine, I'd strongly consider it. Seems like a better course of action would be to get a PCR test if baby has a cough and treat immediately with antibiotics if it's a Pertussis diagnosis.
- Pneumococcus - Polysorbate 80 makes it a bad idea since I have Crohn's (and in general). The infection can also be treated with antibiotics if caught early.
- MMR - Low risk of catching. Vaccine has a weak safety profile.
- Chickenpox - Not severe for kids.
- Hep A - 1% of infants have seizures when exposed to vaccine. Mild disease. Worth considering as an adult.
- Hib - The actHIB brand seems to be low risk and worthwhile, assuming the predominant strain is covered by the vaccine. More research needed.
- Flu - No convincing evidence that it works in infants. Death is rare. Treatable. Usually mild. Vaccine causes flu like symptoms.
I don't want to inject aluminum, formaldehyde, or any foreign substance into my daughter unless it's to reliably mitigate a legitimate, quantifiable risk. Hib is the only one that tentatively meets those criteria.
What am I failing to consider, if anything?