Originally Posted by
golftdibrad
Congratulations, this is the most idiotic thing I have read from someone defending AGW, and I have been exposed to some stupid shit.
In one sentence you managed to state a fact, and then immediately dismiss it. You then follow up with a rudimentary explanation of psychrometrics throwing out some sciencey sounding bullshit about saturation pressure limits. We know what humidity is - the grains of water the air can carry that varies with temperature and pressure, and it varies greatly over the globe at any given time. You going to try and tell us 'the science' can say that 250m years ago we knew what the humidity was with enough precision to tease a co2 signal out of that data AND attribute the GMST changes to this (generally much higher) co2 level? I'm going to not believe that without some very convincing evidence, and everything I've seen from the AGW pushers is junk.