I could try and dig up the old test results from 5-10 years ago. I was actually much less healthy then though. I would be surprised if the numbers weren't higher then than now. Little to no exercise of any kind, lotta fast food, and so on.
I could try and dig up the old test results from 5-10 years ago. I was actually much less healthy then though. I would be surprised if the numbers weren't higher then than now. Little to no exercise of any kind, lotta fast food, and so on.
If you can find them that would be great. I still think you should retest before conceding to these numbers though.
If he doesn't want to spend the money then he doesn't have to spend the money. There are plenty of MIs that occur independent of LDL values so relying on that metric to determine health risk is already silly. If he's worried about it I provided him with an additional metric to look at. There are plenty of research articles on PubMed reporting independent associations between oxidized LDL and cardiovascular disease risk, hemoglobin a1c, and diabetes. You are welcome to search for them. I have no interest in arguing over professional research. The man wanted some practical advice and he received. If he doesn't want to pay for it he doesn't have to but he most certainly should get retested.
I've found some information about different types of LDL particles, patterns A and B. B pattern seems to be the one with the big risk for arterial buildup from what I've read. I've also read that pattern A seems to be more prevalent when blood triglycerides are lower, while pattern B seems to be more prevalent when the triglycerides are high. Thoughts on this?
Believe it or not, I didn’t want to argue about it, I was just trying to learn something.
Glad to hear it. Always happy to help.