starting strength gym
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Experience with Fit3D body scans for measuring body fat % and progress

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    19

    Default Experience with Fit3D body scans for measuring body fat % and progress

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    Hello Robert, curious if you have any experience with Fit3D body scans for measuring body fat % and have any input on their accuracy?
    Seems quite useful for tracking changes to individual body parts when they overlay before/after 3D representations. Just not sure of the accuracy of their body fat % estimations

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    Can't say that I have. Sounds interesting though. Do you have any papers on it?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Found this one. Seems to conclude they're very accurate?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    Looks like it is correlated with DXA. Still unclear on the technology. Looks like they have you stand on a platform and take use an instrument to collect images at different angles. Need to find a methods paper on this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Yes that's exactly how it works. I had one done as a baseline when I started my NLP, looking forward to another when I'm done as it seems most of the value in it is the 3D overlay to see changes.
    You stand on a platform while a camera spins around you and takes a ton of pictures which then get turned into a 3D render of you. They give you a report with estimated body fat and detailed measurements of each body part.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    So are they taking digital photographs and using software to make some sort of conversion?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Yep, that's all I have it. Height, age, and a bunch of photographs. That's why I wonder about the accuracy of the algorithm to figure out bodyfat based on that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    I'm generally skeptical of something like this. I'd have to read how exactly it does this but it sounds like it has many assumptions, like most body composition assessment instruments.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    599

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Santana View Post
    I'm generally skeptical of something like this. I'd have to read how exactly it does this but it sounds like it has many assumptions, like most body composition assessment instruments.
    Do you think those BF%-measuring electric impedance bathroom scales have any use? I have one, I like it because it sends my weight to my phone for tracking, but I am skeptical of its BF% measurement. It has kept me just under 30% for over a year, as my weight hasn't changed and my lifts have gone up. And my waist circ has come down. By the navy measurement equation I'm around 25% at most, which seems about right to my eyeball test.

    For home tracking of BF%, do you recommend scales, calipers, tape measurement, or just ignoring the whole thing and focusing on other metrics?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,619

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    I think all of them are useful for tracking trends so long as the methods are replicated identically. Calipers are the most practical to keep track of regional changes (e.g. if your stomach skinfold gets thicker you likely gained body fat). I have everyone that I work with measure waist and/or hips and it works pretty well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •