important question about BB-RX programming important question about BB-RX programming

starting strength gym
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: important question about BB-RX programming

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    39

    Default important question about BB-RX programming

    • wichita falls texas february 2021 seminar
    • starting strength seminar april 2021
    • starting strength seminar february 2021
    Is every single program in the book described as Reps x Sets ? I'm trying to figure out where to go with my training next week. I'm looking at HLM and it seems like what I'm seeing may be meaning to say Sets x Reps. I've always thought everything in the Starting Strength Canon was indicated as Reps x Sets. Please advise? (sorry if this sounds like an elementary and stupid question).. Thanks..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    39

    Default

    I'm reading BBRX as I'm posting here and just found the answer. I'm reading on Kindle and the formatting is a bit tricky. I see where it says "sets x reps". I love the book. That said, I thought everything in the "Starting Strength" world was written as "reps x sets". Kind of confusing, guys...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    433

    Default

    I believe the convention is, when it is written in one statement including the weight:
    315x5x3 signifies three sets of five.

    But it can be written perhaps like this:

    Monday: 3x5 squat. When not given on context of a weight, I believe this also means three sets of five. Could be wrong as I've never read BBRX, but that's normally the way it's done in PPTST. Good luck, dude!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Sully just did a video about this. Of course, I can't remember what he said ...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Sahuarita, AZ
    Posts
    327

    Default

    My experience is in line with what Devyn said (though I haven't read BBRx, so if it's different, I don't know). Generally if it's just #x#, then it's Sets x Reps. If there is a weight add to the line, then it is Weight x Reps x Sets. For examples:

    3x5 = 3 sets of 5
    1x5 = 1 set of 5
    5x3 = 5 sets of 3
    135x5x3 = 3 sets of 5 @ 135

    I'm not sure why the order inverts when you add the weight, but it does make way more sense in writing, particularly when you don't get the reps for all 3 sets, in which case you might write something like 135x5x2, 4 - meaning 2 sets of 5, and then a set of 4.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Murphysboro, IL
    Posts
    30,148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Devyn Stewart View Post
    But it can be written perhaps like this:

    Monday: 3x5 squat. When not given on context of a weight, I believe this also means three sets of five.
    That's how I've done it since high school some 50 years ago. I see no reason to change it now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Farmington Hills, MI
    Posts
    4,633

    Default

    In the book, the convention is W x R x S when the weight is specified (as in the examples).

    When the weight is not specified (as in the templates/prescriptions), the convention is S x R. This biphasic approach is the Aasgaard convention. I've tried to argue that the convention should be WtxRxS whether the weight is specified or not (that is, either WxRxS or RxS), because I think it's a bit confusing, but I lost that argument. That said, it's not that confusing, once you realize the approach.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    39

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathon Sullivan View Post
    In the book, the convention is W x R x S when the weight is specified (as in the examples).

    When the weight is not specified (as in the templates/prescriptions), the convention is S x R. This biphasic approach is the Aasgaard convention. I've tried to argue that the convention should be WtxRxS whether the weight is specified or not (that is, either WxRxS or RxS), because I think it's a bit confusing, but I lost that argument. That said, it's not that confusing, once you realize the approach.
    You are a wise man Sully. Semper Fi! Thanks for the answers you guys.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •