Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: help me understand

  1. #11

    Default

    This plays into why 5/3/1 works off of 90% of your 1RM. Since they chop 10% off your 1RM in 5/3/1, the average lifter doesn't have to worry about relative intensity.
    This is an interesting video... thanks for sharing...

  2. #12

    Default

    It's a convenient tool for programming, especially if you program based on percentages and not RPE. Since I'm an excel fanatic, I usually use Brzycki's formula to determine relative intensity for certain percentages (just replace weight with %1RM). And to get even more hify with it, I apply some sort of a percentage for fatigue/set (currently using 1.25% for lower rep ranges) to get some sort of a gauge. It's obviously not 100 % accurate as fatigue depends on rest time, conditioning and other factors, but it points to a direction.

    I should probably base the fatigue/set on relative intensity, perhaps also on amount of reps..

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,095

    Default

    So, if one is doing block periodization, where intensity and volume share an inverse relationship by block, is it relative intensity or absolute intensity that you increase over the cycle or both?

    ETA: Thanks to Mike for sharing, and thanks to Izzy for clarifying.
    Last edited by Eric K; 05-20-2017 at 07:37 AM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    6,739

    Default

    Typically both. However, it is more important that an overload occurs than it is that relative intensity trends up.

    For example, if I hit 405x5x5 with the hardest set being @9 and then the next week I do 415x5x5 with the hardest set @8.5, that's a good thing and not a bad thing.

    Relative intensity is just a way to, hopefully, systematically program in overload but you can also do that via linear progress, adding reps, adding sets, decreasing rest periods (depending on desires training effect), etc.

  5. #15

    Default

    Why was the video taken down???

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    the doldrums
    Posts
    4,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mjrpwrlfting View Post
    Why was the video taken down???
    copyright infringement . . . too bad he used so many different background videos

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •