starting strength gym
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: chinups and pullups -- frequency method

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,395

    Default chinups and pullups -- frequency method

    • starting strength seminar jume 2024
    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    I am using the frequency method to improve my chinups. I do anywhere from four to eight sets of seven everyday.

    My question is whether it would be more productive to alternate sets between chinups and pullups? Slightly different stimulus, more lat work, etc. Or would I be shortchanging both movements?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    1,901

    Default

    Whether it'd be "more productive" depends on why you're doing them in the first place, I think. Personally I do chins pretty much exclusively because they use more muscle mass and a longer range of motion. I'm pretty sure John Sheaffer recommends the same thing for the same reason. But if you need to be good at pullups for some reason, like a test or a sport or competition, you should do them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,395

    Default

    I am doing them in preparation for a Marine Corps PFT, on which you can do either pullups or chinups. Perfect score is 20. I will of course be doing chinups.

    As for chinups using "more muscle mass and a longer range of motion," I've read this before from Sheaffer. However, I'm not sure that this should be the whole story on pullups versus chinups. Isn't there a valid response that pullups work a particular part of the chinup musculature harder, and so are also valuable? When I'm going through a lazy period where I do only chins, I sometimes feel that my lats are getting neglected as compared to the stress they get from pullups. So I wonder whether a program of chinups+pullups might improve my chinup max more effectively than a program of chinups alone will. Thoughts?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    190

    Default

    part of the reason to do the "frequency method" is for motor pattern lubing. if you do a different motion, it seems like you'd compromise that benefit. if you want to do 20 chinups, I think you should just keep doing chinups.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,395

    Default

    Good point. I was wondering though whether the movements are similar enough for that effect not to be compromised. In the absence of anecdotes I guess we're just speculating. Best option is probably to just stick with what we know works, i.e., specificity.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    155

    Default

    SS says that chinups use the biceps a fair amount, while pullups barely utilize the biceps at all. In the absence of this biceps usage, pullups relies more on the lats. So both use pretty much the same set of muscles, they just emphasize different individual muscles. I've been doing pullups, but I'm going to switch to chinups because I feel like my back gets enough of a workout with deadlifts. Even more so if you're doing power cleans.

    I wouldn't say there's any harm in doing both, it just may be unnecessary.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronan the Barbarian View Post
    I am using the frequency method to improve my chinups. I do anywhere from four to eight sets of seven everyday.

    My question is whether it would be more productive to alternate sets between chinups and pullups? Slightly different stimulus, more lat work, etc. Or would I be shortchanging both movements?

    Yes it will be. Keep the frequency up, but vary the reps per set, hand spacing, proximity to failure etc....and watch your fatigue. Practicing variations, and not pushing too hard is the key with this sort of training...works like a f*king charm though.

    I would say do a few sets of your target movement (i.e pick your strongest movement as your target exercise), and then do a variation for volume...you need to do a variation because the target movement will get stale (i.e. accomodation) within a few weeks of doing only that movement....a week or so before your test, drop the variations and focus on the target move. Taper your volume 2-3 days before...just do a few sets a day

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,395

    Default

    My PFT was this past Saturday. I did 19 chins, which is a PR. This is at a bodyweight of 230. My previous chins PR was 16 at a bodyweight of around 205.

    Bottom line, I used the frequency method for about a month, never going higher than sets of 8 chins, usually for 3-6 sets per day, and it brought me to 19 chins, a PR by 3 reps. Awesome result.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    I dont understand why this method would be better than doing them till failure. I am sure you guys have it figured out, so I'm just curious why this works better.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    10

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    And, is this in conjunction with another workout like SS, TM, 531 etc?

    If so, wouldnt that interfere with the program?

    Just trying to learn...as 20 is my goal like the OPs.

    Thanks-

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •