that is only one of at least three different ways to high pull
Method 1: High pull with arm bend, pulling the bar as high as possible
Method 2: Sometimes called a shrug pull, same but you keep arms locked and just shrug up. This prevents teaching folks to arm pull
Method 3: After finishing the second pull, you pull your body down (the Chinese do it this way since it better teaches the reversal after the finish of the pull)
And you folks saying 'there's no way to tell if you pulled a high pull high enough' should google 'height gauge'. Not that you youngins should be held responsible for knowing about them: I'm not sure they are used anymore. But the point is that it is more than possible to tell how high you're pulling the bar with one so the argument that high pulls are inferior because of that is wrong. Along with the fact taht you can just as easily catch a powerclean lower (a power clean being defined as anything from about a half squat to standing up). So there's no guarantee of the height of the pull on a powerclean either.
Lyle
Last edited by lylemcd; 01-26-2010 at 01:15 PM.
Glad to see someone defending the high pull. When I started this post I thought that they'd be pretty good to work into a program. I've been reading some articles by Bill Starr and he seems to use them quite a bit.
Last edited by rikkusan; 01-26-2010 at 01:38 PM.
I've been using heavy clean pulls to teach myself not to bend my elbows during power cleans.
Assuming that the same weight were used in both instances, then the pull that was cleaned and then racked high would require more force to be developed more rapidly. The latter instance (catching it lower) depends on your ability to pull yourself under the bar rapidly and then stand up with the weight on your shoulders. Both variants have relevant training applications. Which you use depends on what you want out of your training.
-S.
Lyle, this was what I was picturing when rikkusan asked about high pulls:
http://www.cathletics.com/exercises/...exerciseID=100
The difference between this and a power clean racked high should be obvious.
-S.
This was OP's original question, and if the version of the high pull in question is what I posted in my link, then no it would not be a fair "substitute."
Uncle Buck's purpose for using them seems reasonable in that it's inclusion is meant to better or enhance his actual power clean and not function as a rather poor substitute for it.
-s.
Of course High Pulls wouldn't be as good as actually doing power cleans. What I meant to imply was whether it would be a better substitute than bent-over rows for people who can't/won't do power cleans. Rows get a lot of attention as a sub for power cleans, and I just thought that High Pulls might be a better choice.