Oh, I thought the point of your hypothetical was to be taken seriously, not to discredit your own case by making statements that paint yourself either as a liar or a criminal. My mistake.
No, that's not the way it works. These are modified iPads sold by a company called KnowInk. The only way you "log in" to them via wifi is if they are configured as a hotspot or if some dumbass downloads an application for remote access onto them. The company literally sells a verizon wifi hotspot attachment as an addon for the poll pads and frankly I'd be surprised if you can even access the apple store or sideload apps onto such a device. Moreover, if you actually had remote access, you'd be burying the lede by only characterizing what you've done in the way this has been. Or maybe they utilized this
wifi exploit, but that's not logging into to anything and again, really burying the lede because you would have access to any iOS device with wifi enabled.
You could also just look at
the explanation provided by the GA SoS, which basically explains things the same as I posited them. I expect that every morning the devices are connected to the internet to retrieve updated voter rolls via a hotspot and during this timeframe someone connected to the hotspot and thought they had the keys to the kingdom when really they just had a 4G connection through a network the voting machines aren't even on. Half of it reads like a hit piece, but I'd probably be tempted to do the same if some bum with no background in information security started trying to say he "hacked" my system when he'd done no such thing.
Reality isn't a creative writing class. Just because you can imagine something doesn't mean it's actually happened or is even possible.
Also, color me skeptical when someone claims they can spot fraud merely by looking at ballots. More so when they have no background in any field that would lend itself to that. It reeks of not understanding the decades old phenomena of undervoting.