The federal worker mandate has been reinstated by the 5th circuit, judging that it is legal.
The thing has a life of its own.
The federal worker mandate has been reinstated by the 5th circuit, judging that it is legal.
The thing has a life of its own.
Do you realize that when someone receives a kidney transplant they will need to be placed on immunosuppressants to reduce the likelihood of rejection? An immunosuppressed person would be at serious risk of complications from COVID as well as increased risk of rejection. Your statement regarding "the virus has already killed everyone it is going to kill" shows a clear lack of understanding regarding this issue on your part.
Medicine is about risk vs. reward. Not being vaccinated increases the risk in this instance. Are you suggesting that we in a free society should force doctors to perform medical procedures without minimizing the risks associated with them? Keep in mind, the state is not the one making the decision in this case, it is the medical community. The family is more than free to find a provider willing to take on the risks. However, they will have a hard time finding someone reputable to perform the procedure as doctors won't open themselves up to medical malpractice lawsuits because a family member won't do what is necessary to reduce the risks if complications do arise because risks weren't minimized. I find it amazing that in a post where you are seemingly ranting about freedom and free societies you never once consider the freedom of the medical community to perform what they deem to be best practice.
In a bit of an unrelated note, I would be curious to hear your stance on the Texas woman who is now charged with murder because she performed a self-abortion due to Texas' new archaic anti-abortion laws (that are being mimicked in several more states). This is in fact a healthcare decision imposed by the state/politicians and not the recommendations of the medical community. I hope you would be equally triggered by the violation of her freedoms as well.
Are you advocating for the vaccination of the child, or the parents? And I have a much more clear understanding of this issue than you do.
Medicine is about the money, Doctor. And again, are you advocating for the vaccination of the child, or the parent? And in either case, why? The vaccine neither prevents the disease or it's transmission, which you would know if you were actually familiar with this issue.Medicine is about risk vs. reward. Not being vaccinated increases the risk in this instance.
We are not living in a free society, as this circumstance demonstrates. And the medical community sucks the cock of the state, and has since 1966. You do what you are told to do, and everybody knows it now.Are you suggesting that we in a free society should force doctors to perform medical procedures without minimizing the risks associated with them? Keep in mind, the state is not the one making the decision in this case, it is the medical community.
Utter and complete bullshit. But please continue to pretend that the facts are not the facts. This board is not the general public. The only risks taken by the medical community are from lawyers.The family is more than free to find a provider willing to take on the risks. However, they will have a hard time finding someone reputable to perform the procedure as doctors won't open themselves up to medical malpractice lawsuits because a family member won't do what is necessary to reduce the risks if complications do arise because risks weren't minimized.
The medical community has been free to remove the government's cock from their throat for a very long time, but they seem quite comfortable with it there. The medical community's role is to provide advice, and services if the patient decides to follow the advice. In this case, the medical community has taken on the role of enforcer of the state's will. How many old people did you force to die by themselves locked in a room away from their families, Doctor?I find it amazing that in a post where you are seemingly ranting about freedom and free societies you never once consider the freedom of the medical community to perform what they deem to be best practice.
I'm not familiar with the case. Was she at 7 months? Did she actually miscarry? The State of Texas has a cock too, and lots of people suck it. It appears that you expected me to suck it when it tasted good. I'm not in favor of the state being involved in anything, Doctor.In a bit of an unrelated note, I would be curious to hear your stance on the Texas woman who is now charged with murder because she performed a self-abortion due to Texas' new archaic anti-abortion laws (that are being mimicked in several more states). This is in fact a healthcare decision imposed by the state/politicians and not the recommendations of the medical community. I hope you would be equally triggered by the violation of her freedoms as well.
A little history of Pfizer all should be aware of.
Pfizer'''s History of Fraud, Corruption, and Using Nigerian Children as '''Human Guinea Pigs'''
I am advocating for minimizing the risks or complications for both the donor (father) and the boy receiving a renal transplant. I am also advocating for freedom of the Physician and Cleveland Clinic to perform what they feel is best practice. COVID infections increase the risks associated with the surgery for all participants involved. The Physician should not be obligated to perform a surgery where the risks are unnecessarily increased. This particular family involved is currently doctor shopping (I have read this from other articles) trying to find someone willing to perform the surgery and take on the unnecessary risks. The state is not involved. Let's put this in terms perhaps you will understand. If a trainee comes into your gym and demands that they will not squat, your staff is free to show them the door as that is not the type of training you endorse. If one of your Starting Strength coaches decides that their programming will now consist of leg presses and cable cross overs in place of squats and bench, you would be free to no longer have them represent your brand and show them the door as they would not be performing what you feel is best practice. In these cases the trainee or coach is more than able to seek out others who will comply to their demands, as there is nothing stopping them. If you were to keep your current views/outrage consistent you would be compelled to train this person and keep this coach employed on their terms despite your freedoms being encroached upon regarding what you feel is best practice.
Let me now ask you again, should doctors be forced to perform a surgery without minimizing the risks associated with it simply because of the demands (freedoms) of the individual asking? If so, wouldn't their individual rights also be infringed on? If the state forced them to comply with these demands of the patient, the state would certainly have to be involved (which it appears as though you are against).
As for the Texas woman, I am not 100% certain on the timeline of the abortion. Most articles make it sound like it was within 6 weeks, but I know nothing definitive. What I do know is that she went into a clinic after a miscarriage, divulged some information to the staff regarding the self-abortion (sounds like it should be a HIPPA violation), and was arrested under the new Texas guidelines regarding their moronic abortion laws they just enacted. If you are against the state being involved, I hope that this does in fact make you outraged as well.
Jovan,
It appears Macron is loosing a lot of support and it does look like Le Pen is gaining ground. What's your thoughts on Le Pens relationship with the WEF?