-
Oops, Science Was “Settled”—Until It Wasn’t: Plants Absorb 31% More CO₂ Than We Thought – Watts Up With That?
So all the predictive models are wrong because a base assumption is wrong, got it. Also, if 'the science' missed this critical variable in the carbon cycle, what else could they be missing? How accurate are the water vapor and cloud cover models for example?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules