The OP's "background" is a bit of a tangle of assumptions, and conclusions based on those assumptions, and then speculation based on those conclusions.
This thread is not going to end well.
The OP's "background" is a bit of a tangle of assumptions, and conclusions based on those assumptions, and then speculation based on those conclusions.
This thread is not going to end well.
I'm still trying to figure out how the squat omits the adductors.
Been squatting a long time...got adductorz like a sow has tits.
High school athletes are uniquely motivated to NOT squat to depth, and are aided by plenty of competing direction, advice or evidence indicating that such isn't necessary or beneficial, regardless of veracity. It's a tough sell to them, their coaches, and their PE teachers. Deprogramming the PE / strength training teacher's wide-feet look-up bar-on-neck feet-straight-ahead squat with its accompanying hip impingement is very challenging. Some kids see the light. Most are too proud to take the temporary hit to the poundage and get their knees out and the bar off their neck. Tough to convince kids who have convinced themselves they're experts due to their 3x5x255 squat to 4-inches-above-proper-depth. As if the ass kicking they get every fall isn't enough. Don't compare yourselves with yourselves.
Point being, lack of depth is the default for young athletes, in my neck of the woods.
I don't know for certain, but squatting after some time off has the area around my alleged longus sore enough to be the main inhibitor to comfortable movement for a few days.
If it's biarticular, it operates isometrically. Like all the hamstrings. In contraction under a load.