Chadillac
Member

Yep. Coal does a lot more than just put a bunch of CO2 in the atmosphere. I'd much rather live next to a nuclear reactor than a coal plant. The...

No, you wouldn’t. It doesn’t matter if you’re choosing a local cold or hot spot. What matters is that you’re consistent with how and where...

The locations you’re gathering temperature data are stationary. Anyone that has ridden a motorcycle knows temperatures can change very quickly over...

I trust it, especially after ~1980 when the two curves really start to diverge. For solar luminosity, I believe satellites are able to measure...

From your reference: Because we can see that global temperatures have increased in the last several decades despite solar luminosity...

The Sun hits the Earth with an incredible amount of energy , about equivalent to the power of 170 billion nuclear reactors . Some of that solar...

Yes it does. The r-values from the statistical analysis are listed right above Figure 4. Correlation Coefficient | Introduction to Statistics |...

You're talking about a timespan of 250 million years in which there were a series of ice ages and warming periods due to huge swings in CO2. These...

Correlation vs causation can be determined through a Casual Analysis. First, is there a correlation between atmospheric CO2 and GMST? Second,...

You can disagree, but with r-values as high as 0.97 and P<0.01, the chances of you being wrong is practically a statistical guarantee.

Just a moment... I would clarify that this study does not show a direct linear relationship between atmospheric CO2 and global mean surface...

I don't know who Karl is but the first reference isn't even in English and I think his conclusions about the second reference are horrible. Karl...