Originally Posted by
Robert Santana
Thanks for your post buddy. So I think recomp is an impossible thing to measure first of all. All body composition methods have limitations and even if you were to do a whole body MRI you're still making assumptions about the density of each compartment. That being said, lets' get to your question. PRs are the single best predictor of muscle acquisition. The purpose of a maintenance phase is A) to prevent rapid weight gain after a cut and B) Provide you with adequate fuel during a period where you aren't lifting that heavy (starting a new program). Mass phases are best timed when you start approaching higher intensities/volume etc. The point is whether you are measuring 5 x 5, 10 x 10, or 1RM PRs, you must lift more to gain muscle mass. I find that far too many people worry too much about how much they weigh, how much weight they need to gain etc, when they need to pay more attention to their progress under the bar and use that as the gauge. The diet only works if you are driving progress under the bar. Lastly, and most important, I like maintenance phases because they take into account the fact that we don't gain muscle that rapidly when we are intermediate or advanced lifters. A generous gain in muscle mass for an early intermediate is ~5-10 lb per year. That's less than 1 lb per month. Now since with muscle comes an increase in water, blood volume, and glycogen, we can assume a 1 lb gain per month is fair. So I think when you try to maintain your weight and train hard you will naturally eat more as you get stronger and naturally gain weight over time at a much slower rate than an intentional rapid weight gain.