starting strength gym
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Is there Any Proof that Being Bigger Makes You Slower?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    155

    Default Is there Any Proof that Being Bigger Makes You Slower?

    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    • starting strength seminar february 2025
    • starting strength seminar april 2025
    So I've heard the traditional argument that being bigger and stronger makes you slower/less agile. The stronger part makes no sense to me, but what about getting bigger? Are there diminishing returns at a certain point, or are people good as long as they keep their bodyfat low?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,231

    Default

    If you take the light inline four out of a honda, and stick a big, heavier 351 v8 in it, is it slower?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,057

    Default

    It really seems like this concept came straight out of a video game. Big slow guy vs. small fast guy. I really can't grasp how it would slow you down. At all.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    905

    Default

    Just watch the olympics next year and you'll get some pretty solid evidence.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    4,864

    Default

    Bigger people have more resistance against the air so skinny is better for running and swimming. I think.

    However bigger athletes have more momentum than skinner ones, meaning they're harder to stop, which is good for football.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    73

    Default

    I'd imagine at some point it would come down to training time. It would be difficult for, say, an Olympic caliber sprinter to train hard enough to get faster AND train hard enough to get a 700lb squat just because workouts at that level take time to recover from.

    But I'd also imagine most people will never get to that level. I seem to remember Barry Sanders being rather fast and agile, and he could squat 600lb at a solid 5'8" and 210.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Idk, ask Lebron James.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,921

    Default

    It also depends what you mean by "big". At 6' 170lbs vs. 220lbs? Not slower no. But say +260lbs? Well, kind of yes. It just becomes harder to move yourself and results in a lot more impact etc. after a certain point. This point is pretty high though, especially if it's quality weight.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    168

    Default

    I think there's a difference between big-fat and big-in shape.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    6,635

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Even size due to mucsle will eventually start to slow you down, just like at some point having more money doesn't have any impact on your life. Most people will never get there.

    The bigger issue is that training for size is not the same as training for strength for people beyond novice and that is where you get into problems.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •