starting strength gym
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Practical Programming for Minimum Effective Doses

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    172

    Default Practical Programming for Minimum Effective Doses

    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    Dear Rip,

    Season’s greetings to you and everyone at Starting Strength.

    Revisiting some of your excellent interviews with Stan Efferding and articles on Minimal Effective Dose, my mind has wandered to this:

    Minimal Effective Dose = “enough”, therefore it’s suboptimality compared to other protocols is not relevant if indeed Minimal Effective Dose is the desired regimen. Mark Chaillet - the Bumble Bee they said could not fly - broke world records, won world powerlifting championships and “built a Norse God like physique” (Gallagher) training one single all out rep on the bench, squat and deadlift his entire career once / week. Given all things being equal at this elite level of competition re. genetics, nutrition, pharmacology etc and conceding that he might have done even better on other protocols;

    In your opinion, would Mark Chaillet’s single rep protocol be a fruitful one to follow in terms of a Minimal Effective Dose approach to strength training over an entire lifetime from novice to advanced / masters, irrespective of the trainee’s choice to take steroids or not?

    If so, why? If not, why not?

    Best,

    Robin

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    54,163

    Default

    MED applies in this case to people who cannot recover from the optimum dose. Old guys, people with MS, etc. Mark Chaillet's situation in the 80s is not yours today.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Murphysboro, IL
    Posts
    726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robin UK View Post
    Dear Rip,

    Season’s greetings to you and everyone at Starting Strength.

    Revisiting some of your excellent interviews with Stan Efferding and articles on Minimal Effective Dose, my mind has wandered to this:

    Minimal Effective Dose = “enough”, therefore it’s suboptimality compared to other protocols is not relevant if indeed Minimal Effective Dose is the desired regimen. Mark Chaillet - the Bumble Bee they said could not fly - broke world records, won world powerlifting championships and “built a Norse God like physique” (Gallagher) training one single all out rep on the bench, squat and deadlift his entire career once / week. Given all things being equal at this elite level of competition re. genetics, nutrition, pharmacology etc and conceding that he might have done even better on other protocols;

    In your opinion, would Mark Chaillet’s single rep protocol be a fruitful one to follow in terms of a Minimal Effective Dose approach to strength training over an entire lifetime from novice to advanced / masters, irrespective of the trainee’s choice to take steroids or not?

    If so, why? If not, why not?

    Best,

    Robin
    The above sounds an awfully like something Mike Mentzer came up with. Maybe it worked for Chaillet, but it seems unlikely to work for most people.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    54,163

    Default

    It works just fine on a bunch of Test and Dianabol.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •