Originally Posted by
Bobby32
Hello Mr Rippetoe. Now I must say I like back squats more than front squats, so I’m not some front squat fanboy who is saying their better because I like them more. The reason I think their better though is because when you front squat, you are putting your legs and hips through a longer range of motion than the back squat. Since we know that if range of motion is the reason the weight is reduced, it will be better for strength. For example, a wide grip bench isn’t as effective for building strength as a closer grip bench. Agreed? Since we can keep a nuertral spine going ATG in a front squat, how is it not better than the back squat for quad and glute strength. Now I know what you’re thinking, “What about the hamstring and low back?” Yes there is little to no hamstring and low back involvement in the front squat, but guess what works those? The deadlift. The deadlift works them more effectively than the back squat beucase it is the heaviest load we can expose our lower back to, and hamstrings act isometrically AND concentrically, as supposed to just isometrically in the back squat. So since we know that deadlift will cover our low back and hamstring strength, why limit our quad and glute strength(mainly quad strength beucase the deadlift works the glutes too) by back squatting? Even Bill Starr said in one of his articles that front squats are the greatest test of pure hip and leg strength. Thank you for your time and free service.