I've seen his argument posted, and he makes a poor case.
Left ventricular hypertrophy is indeed a marker of poor heart health and is associated with health risks, but correlation does not equal causation. The ventricle grows in response to increased afterload (the pressure the heart must overcome to get the blood out) increases. Ventricular hypertrophy happens in strength trainees but also in those with hypertension (because chronically increased blood pressure means the heart is pressing against a greater afterload). Can you imagine why one (the hypertrophy itself) might be conflated with the other (health consequences as the result of hypertension)? Other people (who aren't trying to sell a book on how awesome and special cardio is), investigated the question as well. From Brooks and Fahey's classic text "Exercise Physiology:"
Before he can make a solid case, Dr. Jay would need to demonstrate that strength trainees (especially novices) do not achieve heart rates significant enough to cause positive adaptations (some enterprising forumgoers have worn heart rate monitors and would argue against that one), especially when compared to the ridiculously conservative guidelines of the AHA and ACSM. He would also have to demonstrate that weightlifters have higher instances of cardiovascular issues (higher rates of CVD and higher mortality) as the result of "athlete's heart," and I haven't seen any evidence to support that opinion.Originally Posted by Pg 286
This conversation has come up multiple times already. I'm pretty sure Dr. Sullivan has addressed it a few times in the Q&A. There's nothing wrong with cardio. It's great. Do it- especially high intensity intervals. But weightlifting isn't bad for your heart.