starting strength gym
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Would I be stupid...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    745

    Default Would I be stupid...

    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    • starting strength seminar february 2025
    if I replaced OHP with BTN (behind the neck) presses? They feel better to me, because I'm more easily able to move the weight in a straight line (and keep my wrists straight). I tried them for a couple weeks in concurrence with OHPs a few months back and they didn't feel bad, though I never got over 105 pounds for 3x5 because I didn't want to keep increasing the weight while also doing OHP.

    And I know the reasons Rip doesn't recommend them, but would there be any benefits to doing them over OHPs, provided I never got injured?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    I've read in a couple places that behind the neck strict presses is one of the worst exercises for your shoulders, I think thats why when the movement is trained, a lot of people use the push pressing variety

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    745

    Default

    I suppose I should just do it and find out for myself. If I get injured, fuck, just add that one to the list.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    74

    Default

    My experience with the BTN press. I did them for many years, ignoring warnings from older lifters because Arnold and Ed Coan did them. My shoulders gave out when i was about 40 years old. I had to stop all pressing and could only squat with a very wide grip until i discovered this web site. I began rehabing my shoulders with presses and chins. Slowly i could add weight to the bar. Now I can press pain free. My squat grip is still wide but i can concentrate on squating instead of the pain in my shoulders. The BTN press will get you sooner or later. Just keep practicing the press the way Rip teaches. Be patient. Good luck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    413

    Default

    I wouldn't be terribly interested in opinions about how the "BTN will get you!" from anybody that doesn't tell you about the ENTIRETY of their upper-body program over the years.

    Most people have a really shitty history of properly training their shoulders; not doing a heavy row for every chest press; not doing a pulldown or chin for every overhead press; never doing any protective RC work; etc. There's a reason many lifters have shitty shoulders, and secret ... it AIN'T because of what they did, it's because of what they didn't do.

    Yeah, if you're the typical "bench and curl monkey" then the BTN is gonna stress out your supraspinatus. Especially if you try to go too heavy (which your typical bench and curl monkey will do). BTN doesn't have as much pectoral involvement so there's less weight moved in a strict press and no possibility of cheating with a back bend.

    I like BTN. But I have flexible, healthy shoulders.

    They are NOT part of "The Program." But I'd say, feel free to try them, just move carefully on your progression of weight and throw yourself some RC isolation at the end of your workouts.
    Last edited by algunos hombre; 11-28-2012 at 08:01 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,414

    Default

    If you can comfortably do BTN press with good technique then go for it. It cannot injure you any more than any other lift. Its mechanically identical to dumb bell pressing (with conventional grip).

    Any exercise can cause problems if you do them with dangerous technique or if you have some kind of skeletal or muscular issue that make it incompatible. Why do these BTN press naysayers think it is fine for everybody to snatch, do ring/TRX exercises, bench press, overhead press, squat, shoulder isolation work etc.. blanketly. Most peoples peoples bodies can cope with all the common exercises, but there is still a massive number of people whose joints would not withstand basic popular exercises.

    If you have a problem which makes you incompatible with something, you will know.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by romo View Post
    My experience with the BTN press. I did them for many years, ignoring warnings from older lifters because Arnold and Ed Coan did them. My shoulders gave out when i was about 40 years old. I had to stop all pressing and could only squat with a very wide grip until i discovered this web site. I began rehabing my shoulders with presses and chins. Slowly i could add weight to the bar. Now I can press pain free. My squat grip is still wide but i can concentrate on squating instead of the pain in my shoulders. The BTN press will get you sooner or later. Just keep practicing the press the way Rip teaches. Be patient. Good luck.
    What makes you think a similar injury could not have occured with any other lift? People injure their shoulders all the time with all manner of exercises. There is a thread in Rips Q&A right now about a guy who injured his shoulder doing ab wheel rollouts for example. My orthopaedic consultant told me that he had a bi-lateral SLAP tear doing incline DB presses. Does that mean that this exercise is more dangerous than anything else? Football (soccer) players get hamstring & knee ligament injuries all the time. Does that mean that this ball game is way to dangerous to play?

    The fact you did BTN presses for many years without injury is very good going. Most people training lifts hard over a number of years will injure something eventually, that is the nature of training. The more time goes on and the more your progress the more likely you are to get injured.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    I'm not a shoulder guy. So I will quote a guy who is pretty much dreams about shoulders all-day long. Eric Cressey from his T-nation article:


    Adage #8: Behind-the-neck (BTN) movements are dangerous.

    Concurrent extreme external rotation and abduction has been termed the "at-risk" (or 90/90) position by many practitioners, so behind-the-neck lat pulldowns and presses have been blacklisted. These individuals cite potential problems with anterior glenohumeral instability(4,5), external impingement, internal impingement (a new-age diagnosis common in overhead throwing athletes with hypermobility), acromioclavicular joint degeneration, and even the risk of intervertebral disc injuries (due to the flexed neck position). The infraspinatus and teres minor are shortened in the 90/90 position, and may therefore be ineffective as depressors of the humeral head due to shortcomings in terms of the length-tension relationship.(7)

    In my opinion, you must view the two exercises independently of one another. For starters, one must differentiate between exercises involving traction and approximation at the glenohumeral joint. Pulldowns (like most cable exercises) are an example of a traction exercise, as they pull the head of the humerus away from the glenoid fossa. Various pressing exercises, on the other hand, involve approximation; they drive the head of the humerus further into the "socket." Approximation exercises increase the likelihood of subacromial impingement much more than traction exercises, and this is why exercises like pulldowns, pull-ups and shrugs can be integrated into rehabilitation programs before various presses. So, on paper, pulldowns in the "at-risk" position are less dangerous than presses.

    However, in comparison to all the pulldown variations you can do in front of the neck, going BTN is just going to shorten your range of motion and reduce activation of the very musculature you’re trying to train.(11) Plus, it’s just painful to watch people do these because this exercise invariably turns into a jerking, seizure-like motion. The in-front version poses much less risk and offer a better training effect, so why anyone would opt for BTN pulldowns is beyond me. I guess it’s for the same reason some people listen to John Tesh; they just enjoy pain, misery and being looked at like they’re nuts.

    In spite of the approximation issues, I think that you can make a great case for the inclusion of BTN presses for certain individuals. This position allows for comparable loads to the anterior position without compromising range of motion. If you’re considering implementing the exercise, there are several factors that must be taken into account:

    1) Cumulative Volume of the 90/90 position: If you’re already doing back squats and good mornings, you’d likely be better off holding off on BTN presses in order to avoid overloading this potentially harmful position. If you decided to front squat or use a deadlift variation instead of good mornings, though, you might clear up some "space" for BTN presses. You need to consider this cumulative volume from both an acute and chronic sense. There may even be times in the year when you avoid the 90/90 position altogether.

    2) Cumulative Trauma to the Anterior Shoulder Capsule: The 90/90 position isn’t the only thing that can irritate the anterior shoulder capsule. Bench pressing and pulldowns/pull-ups also contribute to cumulative stress on this area. I know that I can’t handle BTN pressing with my powerlifting volume, and I can’t say that I know many powerlifters who utilize BTN presses on a regular basis. We simply get enough stress on this front (pun intended) from squats, good mornings, and bench press variations. As is the case with #1, you need to consider both acute and chronic trauma.

    3) Goal of Inclusion: Very simply, you need to ask yourself: why are you doing this exercise? If you’re someone with much to be gained from BTN presses, then they deserve much more consideration than if you’re a regular ol’ weekend warrior or senior citizen who is just interested in getting in shape and staying healthy. As I noted with good mornings in Part I, it all comes down to how much you’re willing to risk.

    4) Flexibility: In order to be able to perform BTN movements with the most safety, one needs to have a considerable amount of humeral external rotation range of motion. As a rule of thumb, if someone has trouble back squatting with anything narrower than an ultra-wide grip, I don’t want them doing BTN pressing.

    5) Injury History: If you have a history of rotator cuff problems, I’d advise against performing BTN movements unless you’ve been asymptomatic for an extended period of time. Even then, approach the exercise with caution in your programming and carefully consider your alternatives.

    6) Posture: This issue parallels #4 for several reasons. First, if you’ve got significant anterior tilt and winging of the scapulae and internal rotation of the humeri, you aren’t going to have the flexibility to get into the proper position to do BTN presses. And, even if you can manage to squirm your way under the bar, when you start to press, you’ll be at greater risk of subacromial impingement due to the inability of the scapulae to posteriorly tilt with overhead pressing. This is a common scapular dyskinesis pattern related to weakness of several scapular stabilizers, most notably the serratus anterior.

    Of perhaps greater concern is the tendency to want to compensate for this lack of flexibility by either flexing the neck—something you want to avoid at all costs in a weight-training context—or allowing forward head posture (where the chin protrudes off a less-flexed neck) to take over. Most people have problems with forward head posture, so the last thing you want to do is reinforce it.

    The take-home message on BTN movements is that BTN pulldowns belong in the garbage can, and BTN presses should be used sparingly only in those who meet certain criteria, can effectively write strength training programs, and are willing to assume a bit of risk.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,414

    Default

    Eric Cressey is heavily biased.

    He has a shoulder problem which prevents him from doing any kind of overhead pressing, and he also stops all of his clients doing any form of overhead pressing.

    If you are using Cressey as your source to blacklist the behind neck press, then you better black list the regular press too.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Dastardly View Post
    Eric Cressey is heavily biased.

    He has a shoulder problem which prevents him from doing any kind of overhead pressing, and he also stops all of his clients doing any form of overhead pressing.

    If you are using Cressey as your source to blacklist the behind neck press, then you better black list the regular press too.
    Did you read what I quoted? What I quoted is from an article that is busting exercise myths...AKA BTN pressing. No wonder people take what you say with a grain of salt

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •