starting strength gym
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Women and superior lower back strength

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,032

    Default Women and superior lower back strength

    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    This is not strictly on topic for this board, but I read an interesting article in Science Illustrated on how women's backs have adapted to support the strains of pregnancy (Harvard and Uni of Texas study). A bit of googling found a Harvard Uni article on the same:

    http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/fo...rain-pregnancy

    Here is an excerpt:

    The research also demonstrates, for the first time, that human lumbar
    vertebrae differ between males and females in ways that decrease the
    shearing forces that the lumbar extension of pregnancy places on the
    lower back in pregnant mothers.

    "In females, the lordosis is subtly different than that of males,
    because the curvature extends across three vertebrae, while the male
    lordosis curves across only two vertebrae," says Whitcome. "Loading
    across three vertebrae allows an expectant mother to increase her
    lordosis, realigning her center of gravity above her hips and offsetting
    the destabilizing weight of the baby."

    In addition to the difference in the number of vertebrae across which
    the lordosis spans, the female joints are relatively larger and flare
    out further down the spine than those of males, improving the spine's
    strength. All of this contributes to an increased ability to extend the
    spine, so that the woman can lean back, realign the body's center of
    gravity, and safely maintain a more stable position. These differences
    in the lower back may even reinforce her capability to support and carry
    her baby in her arms after the baby has been born.


    In your books you have discussed womens' strength to bodyweight ratio compared to mens mens', and I have read elsewhere that lower body muscle strength in both sexes tends to be a lot closer than upper body. I was thinking maybe this has a effect too. It could explain a few of those tiny girls with scary-heavy squats I have seen.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    54,186

    Default

    It explains nothing, other than that females have a very slightly different spinal morphology than men due to the requirements of balancing the fetus and later the baby. If anything, a predisposition to overextend the spine -- which many of us have noticed in far more females than males -- carries an increased risk of extension-related disc injury. Training is a perfectly adequate explanation for a scary squat, and steroids help, but not a different lordotic curve.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,032

    Default

    Ok thanks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •