Did you actually read the study, or just the abstract? Because the abstract tells us nothing useful about what they did.
I just read http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22158142, which essentially concluded 8 sets would be better for 1RM squat strength than 1 or 4 in trainees that could already squat 130%+ bodyweight.
I can't find it anywhere in the study, but I assume they only squatted once a week.
Am I right to assume doing 8 sets instead of 3 wouldn't work for a program like SS as we're squatting 3 times a week versus the assumed 1 in the study?
Did you actually read the study, or just the abstract? Because the abstract tells us nothing useful about what they did.
I read the entire study.
The trainees followed a 2 split and they only trained legs with squats, so squatting twice a week. The 1RM was recalculated after each week to ensure the training is progressive and they did each set to positive failure with 3 minutes pause inbetween each set. Edit: All squat repetitions were performed to a depth of 90° knee flexion, and repetition cadence was set at 2-second descent and 1-second ascent.
Here's an illustration of the average reps each group managed per set and the results:
Essentially the conclusion seems to be that with 8 sets the strength increase percentage is bigger after 3 weeks compared to the other two groups.
I don't often read studies like these, so I'm not sure if I've misunderstood parts of it or its conclusion, though.
Last edited by Tunafisher; 02-10-2012 at 02:31 PM.
Oh damn, my bad, it's 6 weeks, with an additional 4 weeks (T3) afterwards to accommodate for overreaching.
And the half squats explain how they managed to go up ~20kg in just a few weeks.
They should also include a group doing just one max set (doubles/ 1 reps) of squats everyday. I believe doing it this way is most beneficial to increase 1RM.
This is odd, since 1rm squat attempts typically take longer than 1s on the way up.and repetition cadence was set at 2-second descent and 1-second ascent.