starting strength gym
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Power Snatch in Texas Method

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    84

    Default Power Snatch in Texas Method

    • starting strength seminar august 2024
    • starting strength seminar october 2024
    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    Hey,
    in PPST 3rd edition the standard template for the Texas Method introduces the power snatch, but doesn't tell why. We already have the power clean, so why do we need the power snatch in addition?

    Thanks in advance,
    Christof

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    7,856

    Default

    Andy may have some inside info on the specific thought process they had there, but in general, you don't absolutely NEED it but it's a very useful movement for it's expression and development of power over a long range of motion, and one that requires a bit more skill than the clean. So for an intermediate lifter, this is the time to expand the range of exercises used in the program, but we don't just do so haphazardly. The intermediate lifter may be exploring his options with regard to competitive purposes. Perhaps strongman, or olympic lifting. Or perhaps he's gotten bored of just cleans. We want to choose a movement that's still has a specific useful place in the program, but that expands he lifter's repertoire and introduces new skills and movement challenges. The power snatch is a great example of that, and it's included so you can get an example of good way and time in the training program to introduce such a thing. The upright row and the upside down bosu pushup are not good examples of that. Hence, they are not in PPST3.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    4,909

    Default

    To add to Wolf's perspective, although the effective force expressed ends up being somewhat close to that of the clean, the duration of the impulse is shorter, meaning several things: Faster contractile velocity while producing similar force is required (because the bar has to travel higher, and thus must be moving faster / accelerated at a greater rate), less overall training volume (tonnage) while maintaining intensity, longer range of motion, a different rack position which also has a training effect due to load pathing, etc, etc.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Makes a lot more sense for me now. Thanks to both of you for your fast replies.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •