I have decided not to be associated with Reebok. In any way. And if Reebok claims that a pair of shoes strengthens your buttocks, I have decided wisely.
I have decided not to be associated with Reebok. In any way. And if Reebok claims that a pair of shoes strengthens your buttocks, I have decided wisely.
Lol, I assume these are the shoes which Reebok is now being forced to give a re-fund on due to false advertising claims about.
As someone fascinated with charlatanry, I have to admire this level of scamming. It's audacious, it's simple and simply brilliant. It's reminiscent of the Frenchman who, in the 1790s, claimed to have developed a pair of rubber shoes that would allow him to walk across the Seine.
The whole idea of these shoes is the "instability-producing balance pods" in the sole, which force you make corrections in your gate, strengthening and beautifying your warp core and posterior nacelles. Or something like that. Basically, it's a Bosu ball for each foot.
It sounds like the antimatter of weight lifting footwear to me.
These toning shoes are great and the explanation for why they work makes total sense, as evidenced by the situation reebok is in here.
I just assumed this was a troll question, considering yesterday's news: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/bu...ines&emc=tha25
My favorite part is where Reebok claims these shoes "tone and strengthen a customer’s legs 11 percent better than regular walking shoes and sculpt bottoms 28 percent better." How, exactly, does one measure a 28% better sculpt?
This is the same company currently sponsoring Crossfit. Hmmmmmmmm.......