starting strength gym
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Thoughts on handheld body fat analyzers?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,641

    Default Thoughts on handheld body fat analyzers?

    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    • starting strength seminar february 2025
    • starting strength seminar april 2025
    So, I ran into one of these today at an "introductory session" at the LA Fitness I signed up for. I had no idea these things existed. Any thoughts on these things and their accuracy? Gave me a way higher bodyfat estimate than I ever would've expected, especially going off past data obtained with three-site caliper testing.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,751

    Default

    What about this session are you referring to? The handheld fat percentage assessment tools are mostly bs but useful for trending.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,641

    Default

    Just having some lady who worked at the gym have me hold the thing and tell me I was at 30% bodyfat. I'd used three site measurements with calipers before largely to track trends, but I also ran the percentage calculations each time. Last time I was around this bodyweight I got something in the vicinity of 20% I think. I'm pretty sure I've gained lean mass since then, since my lifts have only gone up. I had read an article where you went into bodyfat measurement techniques and gave a rundown on their utility, but I didn't recall mention of these handheld things. I was just curious if you had any thoughts on their accuracy. 30% struck me as a percentage to worry about, especially after just having lost to the tune of 40 pounds over the last 3 months. But I've been reading about these on my own too, and they do seem pretty unreliable. Even the fine-tuned laboratory ones supposedly have accuracy issues, and I'm sure the consumer versions like this are only worse.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,751

    Default

    The gold standard is autopsy. Outside of that they all have assumptions and are probably more accurate for some people than others. I'm good on having an autopsy done though.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    374

    Default

    I have three years of data including measurement of body fat with a hand held device. I can categorially say a pair of dice would be more accurate! I have weighted as high as 212 on the list and as low as 188. The BF reading from the handheld device is completely junk! I chopped off 20 pound while still lifting heavy with taking two inch's off my waist, and the net effect says I gained body fat. So I put zero trust in the device.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    183

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by CommanderFun View Post
    Just having some lady who worked at the gym have me hold the thing and tell me I was at 30% bodyfat. I'd used three site measurements with calipers before largely to track trends, but I also ran the percentage calculations each time. Last time I was around this bodyweight I got something in the vicinity of 20% I think. I'm pretty sure I've gained lean mass since then, since my lifts have only gone up. I had read an article where you went into bodyfat measurement techniques and gave a rundown on their utility, but I didn't recall mention of these handheld things. I was just curious if you had any thoughts on their accuracy. 30% struck me as a percentage to worry about, especially after just having lost to the tune of 40 pounds over the last 3 months. But I've been reading about these on my own too, and they do seem pretty unreliable. Even the fine-tuned laboratory ones supposedly have accuracy issues, and I'm sure the consumer versions like this are only worse.
    I was under the impression that fat measurements were supposed to be taken first thing in the morning. Not directly after training, which usually causes drinking water and inflating the tissue being measured.

    As mentioned, the readings vary greatly, depending on when, where and how the measurement was taken. They are very good at establishing trends, but visual assessments (IME) have been much more accurate in assessing actual percentage, unless of course you're carrying an excessive amount of BF. In which case, you don't need to know an exact percentage...you're just fat, and that answer should be good enough to get you to work at losing it.

    JMCTW...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •