To use an example from another sport: Zach Randolph. The dude is quite good, but he is basically ground-bound. He is a big, tall, strong man, but is nowhere near as athletic as even just the average guy playing his position in the NBA. He used to average 20/10.
At certain positions, in certain sports, and with a high level of skill/sport specific IQ, you can definitely succeed while being much less athletic than your peers, but I don't think it's going to be very common. I don't know that you could be a good NFL RB without being a freak athlete, but there's plenty of first basemen that I wouldn't call genetic freaks by any extent.
I agree completely. It's also something to keep in mind that people have the propensity to display athleticism in one aspect, and then look like a club foot in another. Tom Brady is slow as hell, but he's smart and can throw a football awfully damn well.
On a non-professional level, the only two things I'm good at are drinking beer, and hitting a ball with a stick really hard and far. And I've always been able to do that, I hit a baseball 235 ft when I was 7 and I can even throw pretty decent. But in the grand scheme of things, I'm slow and weak, and would be considered a pretty poor athlete.
Yes. Welbourn said he was never afraid of guys who looked like a million bucks and were all quads and upper body. He said he always was concerned with the guys who were bubble butt, walked the way that would make the Supple Leopard have a heart attack and were beer truck drivers.
I've seen lots of shitty athletes in terms of the physical attributes that more than make up for it with sport IQ.
He said that about Supple Leopard? Because in the book it specifically mentions welbourne and his experience with over 30 podiatrists pre-draft who examined players feet in order to predict future ACL tears (collapsed arches are far more likely to have ACL injuries than normal arches). Walking the supple leopard way is exactly how all good athletes walk. Walking pigeon/duck toed with valgus knees (collapsed arches) is exactly the type of guy who isn't going to be a very good athlete, or one who won't stay on the field very long - and I find it hard to believe that Welbourne would see a guy like that and have any sort of concern.
Fallen arches equal valgus knees? Always? Are you sure?
Could someone explain the argument behind walking duck toed = bad athlete thing. I won't take the time to find and post a bunch of video, but, while watching NBA games many times I have noticed LeBron walks very duck footed. Does the foot thing have any real impact? Obviously outside of cases of extreme valgus knees or something similar