starting strength gym
Page 3130 of 3130 FirstFirst ... 21302630303030803120312831293130
Results 31,291 to 31,297 of 31297

Thread: COVID19 Factors We Should Consider/Current Events

  1. #31291
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Garage of GainzZz
    Posts
    3,404

    Default

    • starting strength seminar december 2024
    • starting strength seminar february 2025
    • starting strength seminar april 2025
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Jackson View Post
    No, it won't. America will continue along the same general course of decline for the next four years, just as it would have with a Xannied-out Harris elected as President. Bar some relatively unimportant and historically irrelevant tweaks to economy or immigration policy.

    Nothing. Ever. Happens.

    As long as you just turn out to vote and everyone claims to believe in the pretense of electoral politics, & lend the process legitimacy - that's all that matters, and nothing will continue to happen. The entropic shit-show carries on, and you will be managed through the decline of the West, as you were before the election under Biden, and Trump before him.

    You, the demos, get to argue and moralise and theorise about what the elites have chosen to ***already implement*** on your behalf - and you are permitted to endlessly converse about the after-effects of these decisions.

    Mentally unstable, pink-haired leftard kindergarten instructors and paranoid feminised homosexual men, like in the stupid video, will continue to speak nonsense and LARP as persecuted cultural rebels. And the cuckservative right will drone on about the hypocrisy of it all.

    Regardless of all that, the European man still exists. The Englishman is still here, in my country, too.

    We're still here but we're psychologically unable to give ourselves permission to organise and act while we engage in electoral politics. Until we decide to stop being gay and break the illusion, nothing will ever happen. The endless conversation will happen the week after the election, just as it did the week before. That's all.
    No fucking blackpilling.

  2. #31292
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Rippetoe View Post
    [/B] Get this idea out of your mind..
    Got it.

  3. #31293
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wal View Post
    It is my fault that I don't understand the "peer review" process. I worked in a highly regulated industry for over 30 years where every thing I did was scrutinized every document that I wrote or read was checked then checked again because we were working with such dynamic forces that if there was failure in procedure or equipment the results could be catastrophic.
    Yes Wal, you're a Boomer, you think everything is like your experience and when something pops up to contradict that belief you just go "huh that's wild" and continue on.


    "The peer review process cannot be total bullshit or ghey as Mark would have never subjected his study to the Strength and Conditional Journal for their appraisal many years ago."

    Why must it not be total bullshit because Mark submitted an article to the process? What about Mark Rippetoe engaging in a process bestows it with some legitimacy? Does this carry over to other things? when Mark submits a steaming fresh journal article to his toilet, does the toilet become a dispenser of wisdom and science?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yngvi View Post
    As you have learned in Britain, legal immigration is much more dangerous than illegal immigration.
    As we have learned in the US, the Boomer generation does not care about the future of its children.
    Demographics is destiny.
    If a Boomer was faced with an enemy, a friend, and a stranger and had a gun with 2 bullets, he'd turn around and shoot his grandkids twice.

  4. #31294
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    491

    Default

    Is it really "black-pilling" to suggest that no massively important "happening" will actually happen after this next election, in which a New York real estate guy/host of The Apprentice will become the next President (again, for a second time)?

    It's not black-pilling to admit that giving this process further legitimacy and voting to "buy" another 4 more years of time is not just foolish - it's suicidal.

    We actually need millions of diabetic, depressed, sportsball-enjoying normie Americans to stop consuming Product for more than 10 seconds and get more BLACK-PILLED about the reality of "democracy", and the future which awaits them if they continue to down this path, before anything can actually *happen*.

    People don't actually want anything to happen because the prospect of what that would entail to their materialistic existence is deeply terrifying.

    The elites know this, and the entire two-party political system is set-up in a way so that nothing ever happens.

  5. #31295
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Ozarks
    Posts
    1,361

    Default

    mkm5:

    I owe you both an apology and a clarification. The apology is simple: I'm sorry that I chose to engage in anger, and shaped my words as such, on a topic that didn't rate it. And to you -- who did not deserve it. I degraded myself and my position. I'm sorry, and I will strive to do better going forward.

    I think in many ways we agree: immigration, whether illegal or legal, carries many risks. For decades, policy and enforcement have left us wide open to those risks, and we have thousands of obvious cases of that causing serious consequences. The reliance of some industries and communities on illegal and legal migrant work is certainly a part of those unabated risks and consequences. I also don't think we should just leave it as is, but at the same time the scope of the compound problem is something that should be addressed. Perhaps my point is instead to focus and prioritize who should go first, and I think that's pretty clear: the violent criminal and terrorist elements that pose a serious and immediate threat to Americans. There's not much nuance there, and hopefully a day is coming soon where federal, state and local law enforcement are empowered to fall upon them with thunder and fury. I will be first in line for that duty. We deal with it, perhaps to a lesser degree, even out here in the sticks.

    Please understand that I want a higher degree of nuance, care and planning to go into the rest, though. For the sake of human dignity for all affected, and certainly to protect Americans and their communities. I'm not saying it can't or shouldn't be done, but let's approach certain aspects with the respect and wisdom that they warrant.



    Matt Jackson:

    Still waiting on your definition of Christian Zionist. I'm not trying to be snide. I've done my own research into why certain ideas have perpetuated through communities of faith, and so I'm asking for clarification both because of our similarities and differences in perspective and opinion on the topic. If you're not interested, then fair enough.

  6. #31296
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    1,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Rowe View Post
    mkm5:

    I owe you both an apology and a clarification. The apology is simple: I'm sorry that I chose to engage in anger, and shaped my words as such, on a topic that didn't rate it. And to you -- who did not deserve it. I degraded myself and my position. I'm sorry, and I will strive to do better going forward.

    I think in many ways we agree: immigration, whether illegal or legal, carries many risks. For decades, policy and enforcement have left us wide open to those risks, and we have thousands of obvious cases of that causing serious consequences. The reliance of some industries and communities on illegal and legal migrant work is certainly a part of those unabated risks and consequences. I also don't think we should just leave it as is, but at the same time the scope of the compound problem is something that should be addressed. Perhaps my point is instead to focus and prioritize who should go first, and I think that's pretty clear: the violent criminal and terrorist elements that pose a serious and immediate threat to Americans. There's not much nuance there, and hopefully a day is coming soon where federal, state and local law enforcement are empowered to fall upon them with thunder and fury. I will be first in line for that duty. We deal with it, perhaps to a lesser degree, even out here in the sticks.

    Please understand that I want a higher degree of nuance, care and planning to go into the rest, though. For the sake of human dignity for all affected, and certainly to protect Americans and their communities. I'm not saying it can't or shouldn't be done, but let's approach certain aspects with the respect and wisdom that they warrant.



    Matt Jackson:

    Still waiting on your definition of Christian Zionist. I'm not trying to be snide. I've done my own research into why certain ideas have perpetuated through communities of faith, and so I'm asking for clarification both because of our similarities and differences in perspective and opinion on the topic. If you're not interested, then fair enough.
    David, you seem to be a decent, hard working respectful human being with strong convictions, and you have no need to apologize for that.

    If the shtf, I'd stand with people like you and others here to get through it.

    Mike

  7. #31297
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    183

    Default

    starting strength coach development program
    Quote Originally Posted by Subby View Post
    If a Boomer was faced with an enemy, a friend, and a stranger and had a gun with 2 bullets, he'd turn around and shoot his grandkids twice.
    Congrats. You win the most moronic thing posted on the internet this week award.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •