And then what happens to their back angle when the pull starts/plates leave the floor?
Rip:
In your book, you talk about the hips not rising up on the initial pull from the floor, as it is a waste of energy, etc, etc.
When I watch videos of competitive olympic lifters (C&J), it looks like they are keeping their butt lower down and their back angle more vertical on the setup. Am I correct in thinking that their positioning is mostly because of favorable anthropometry, rather than a difference in technique?
And then what happens to their back angle when the pull starts/plates leave the floor?
I'm hijacking this, if OP don't mind. (and to answer Rip's question for you the hips rise to where they would be in his method anyway).
Rip, I keep hearing from the guys at my gym that I miss snatch attempts because of the hips high position. I am losing the bar in front of me at the bottom of the snatch. One guy says that it is because of the low-bar style squat I use and the hips high start. The reasoning is that because the hips pull back and away (like in a low bar) in the catch and my torso isn't vertical enough. According to him it's the low bar that is causing an "incorrect movement pattern" for the overhead. Is this a reasonable argument? I just think it's probably because I suck at the lifts.
Send me a video, but I'll bet it's your rack, i.e. not shrugging to meet the bar.
I understand that the back angle becomes more horizontal until they reach the correct starting position as outlined. A more correct way to phrase my question was:
Why do they start in the low hips, more vertical back angle position in their set up? Why not just start in the position as you described from the beginning?
Like Dimas does? Excellent question. I think it is because they are taught otherwise.
I think that's just a resting position. If you watch the videos, the bar doesn't leave the floor until everything is in place.
You're wrong, Carny. They are taught to try to pull from this position.