I was responding to the original post:
If he hasn't really switched from DLs to PCs, then I'm glad to hear that the OP was incorrect. However, Shiva did add this:
How he weights different inputs is what I think people are challenging here.
If the takeaway is that it's good to train both strength training and conditioning, then I don't think anyone is disagreeing. Some of the weirdness about arterial stiffening, and conclusions about percentage of training time spent in one mode vs. the other (when basically all studies get very basic things wrong about those modalities from the start) is what is mostly being challenged here. Taleb is great at statistical mathematics, but if the inputs and assumptions are flawed, then the results will be, too.